Tag: insurance

  • Contractors Pollution / Professional

    Terms

    • Coverage: Professional (Claims-Made), and Pollution (Occurrence or Claims-Made)
    • Minimum Premium: $5,000 
    • Capacity: $50M (multiple carriers can be layered to provide higher limits) 
    • Appetite: virtually all construction related contracting work, including; Trade Contractors, Design/Build Contractors, Project/Construction Managers, General Contractors, Environmental Contractors, and more… 

    Professional Liability Coverages

    • Contractors Professional Liability: broad language covering negligent acts, errors or omissions 
    • Rectification / Mitigation: quickly correct professional errors to mitigate the overall size of a loss 
    • Protective / Indemnity Loss: negligent acts, errors, or omissions from subcontracted professionals 
    • Legal Defense 

    Pollution Liability Coverages

    • Contractors Pollution Liability
    • Transportation Pollution Liability 
    • Emergency Remediation Expense 
    • Non-Owned Disposal Site Liability 
    • Premise Pollution Liability (aka your operating location)
    • Mold, Asbestos, Natural Resource Damages, Silica, Lead, etc. 
    • Legal Defense 
    • Image Restoration 
    • Emergency Claim Support 

    Claim Scenarios

    Contractor’s Professional Liability 

    • A GC miss-read project site plans, and mistakenly extended the paving of a parking across the property line. A year later, the error was identified when the neighboring property was surveyed. Claim costs included the demo and restoration of the neighboring property, and re-design of the parking lot’s drainage system, totaling $750,000.  

    Contractor’s Professional Rectification / Mitigation Coverage 

    • Prior to completion of a new commercial building, the project GC discovered an error in the HVAC system, which allowed moisture build-ups at various points in the system. By identifying the mistake prior to completion, the cost to correct the error was significantly less than if it had gone undetected.

    Contractor’s Professional Indemnity / Protective 

    • A subcontractor used an incorrect pipe size for a new commercial fire-sprinkler system. The error was discovered post construction when the system failed to operate correctly. The Sub’s professional policy had inadequate limits to cover the $3M claim. Lucky for the GC, their Protective Indemnity endorsement responded to the balance.  

    Contractors Pollution Liability (Jobsite) 

    • A major thunderstorm destroyed the storm water runoff controls at a construction site, forcing sediment to flow down grade and into a nearby lake.  The GC was liable for the damages, which exceeded $2,000,000.  
    • A contractor ruptured an underground gas line, causing a high-pressure release. Due to safety concerns, local authorities evacuated a 2-block radius around the release, forcing nearby businesses to shut down temporarily. Costs for clean-up, 3rd party business interruption, and natural resource damages totaled over $1,000,000. 

    Transportation Pollution Liability (TPL) 

    • A truck crashed while transporting raw materials, releasing the contents into a nearby wetland. Costs for investigation, remediation, additional monitoring, and natural resource damages exceeded $250,000.  

    Premises Pollution Liability (Contractor Operating Facilities)

    • A contractor installed a 10,000-gallon diesel tank at their headquarters for fueling trucks / equipment. While loading equipment onto trucks, the crane operator hit the fuel tank, allowing thousands of gallons to spill into the surrounding soils, and onto a neighboring property. Total cost of the claim was roughly $350,000. 

    Legal Defense 

    • A former industrial building was redeveloped into new, mixed-use commercial space. 5-years after completion, a child who lived the building was diagnosed with lead poisoning. The child’s parents, along with several other residents, filed bodily injury lawsuits against the General Contractor who oversaw the project. In response, the GC’s Pollution-Professional policy organized and funded a robust defense team, including legal, environmental, and medical experts. The defense team proved no evidence of lead in the building and highlighted several items in the child’s past as the likely the cause of the poisoning. The suit was dropped. The GC was billed for a mere $10,000 deductible, while total defense costs exceeding $400,000. If not for the broadened pollution / professional policy, the suit could have been lost, and uncovered claims totaling in the millions. 
  • Environmental Exposures Impacting High Net Worth Insureds

    In this High Net Worth (HNW) competitive environmental intelligence, we examine the article “7 Crucial Risks Facing High Net Worth Families” and have broadened it by adding the environmental exposures (bold below) that are part of the 7 crucial risks facing HNW insureds.

    As the article highlights:  High net worth (HNW) individuals and families face many risks due to their complex lifestyles. The wealth they have accumulated makes their property and casualty exposures more complex than the average consumer, and their risks oftentimes rival those of a business in scope.

    The frequency and complexity of the risk exposures faced by HNW families and individuals make it necessary to adopt proactive risk prevention strategies, as well as the purchase of insurance protection to make them whole should they suffer a loss.

    The ERMI, Patent Pending, HNW Pollution Insurance Program is designed to protect your HNW insureds from the environmental exposures impacting their resources while better protecting your E&O exposure.

    If you are not assisting your HNW insureds on managing and transferring their environmental exposures, the only coverage they may have when they experience an environmental liability is your E&O insurance.

    7 Crucial Risks Facing High Net Worth Families

    From cyber risks to global travel, high net worth families have a host of risks to manage.

    By: Lisa Lindsay | June 26, 2018 • 3 min read

    High net worth (HNW) individuals and families face many risks due to their complex lifestyles. The wealth they have accumulated makes their property and casualty exposures more complex than the average consumer, and their risks oftentimes rival those of a business in scope.

    The frequency and complexity of the risk exposures faced by HNW families and individuals make it necessary to adopt proactive risk prevention strategies, as well as the purchase of insurance protection to make them whole should they suffer a loss.

    1) Cyber Crime

    The use of technology and social media, the number of connected devices per household and the number of people (staff, advisers) communicating with HNW individuals make them prime targets for cyber crimes.

    These crimes include email phishing, ransomware and unauthorized bank transfers. While the insurance industry is starting to offer insurance protection for some of these losses, the best defense is practicing good cyber hygiene.

    2) Catastrophic Weather Losses

    Hurricanes, flooding and wildfires will continue to impact HNW families since many of them own homes in disaster-prone tropical or mountainous regions.

    Traditional risk identification tools such as FEMA flood maps are outdated and do not accurately reflect risk. In recent years, we’ve seen unprecedented flooding in areas that have never or rarely been flooded before. These extreme weather events will continue to impact the HNW.

    To prevent losses, families and individuals must work with professionals who can provide more advanced risk identification resources, as well as resources to help prevent or mitigate losses, such as hurricane and wildfire protective services.

    HNW insured’s with assets located where natural disasters occur must have a financial assurance strategy to address the pollution liabilities created by Natural Disasters.  The ERMI HNW Pollution Program covers pollution liabilities from natural disasters or acts of God.  ERMI has more information on pollution liabilities associated with Natural Disasters.  Please contact us for more on this subject.

    3) Collections Management

    HNW families and individuals are known to have a passion for collections, such as art, furniture, memorabilia and cars. Many collections are a significant asset class in their financial portfolio and are managed aggressively to increase value, which may mean the collection is on exhibition or on loan to museums and galleries.

    This increase in risk exposures requires specialized risk management solutions.

    A good example of how specialized risk management solutions comes into play took place after the California mudslides — coverage was afforded for some who had specialized fine art insurance versus traditional homeowners’ coverage where mudslides are not typically covered.

    Collectables such as automobiles, boats, aircraft… have a variety of environmental exposures associated with their use, maintenance and storage.

    Example:  It was never determined how a yacht at a marina caught on fire.  Because of the fire, neighboring boats also caught on fire.  Fire departments responded to the fires and after the fires were put out the resulting environmental damage cost the yacht owner more than $2,000,000 in fines, penalties, cleanup, business interruption….

    4) Employee-Related Risks

    HNW families hire employees who help run their households. These individuals range from nannies, caretakers, captains and crew, to housekeepers and assistants.

    Employees bring about risk exposures related to on-the-job injuries and employment practices liability exposures. HNW individuals need to adopt the same stringent hiring practices that a business adopts when hiring and terminating employees.

    Practices should include background checks, onboarding protocols, regular performance reviews and the like.

    Employees (landscapers, janitorial, boat captains, aircraft pilots, contractors…) can and do create environmental liabilities for HNW insured’s.

    Example:  An English speaking but not English reading employee accidentally mixed non-compatible chemicals for cleaning.  The fumes from the chemicals forced the evacuation of all the building tenants while decontamination took place.  Third party bodily injury, property damage and business interruption claims against the HNW building owner exceeded $1,000,000.

    5) Security Risks

    Security at home and during travel — including the risks of terrorism and global conflict — also remains a top concern.

    Security concerns can range from home security alarms and devices to worldwide travels concerns.

    For families with complex risk exposures, consulting with a security expert is recommended. These experts provide a full risk assessment that would minimize any security breach, such as a home invasion, a cyber breach or any other issue that could put the family at risk.

    HNW individuals are targets of vandals.  Vandals can and have created environmental liabilities while carrying out their crimes.  Under federal law, you are responsible for the environmental condition of your property regardless of who caused the environmental liabilities.  The ERMI HNW Pollution Program can protect insureds from environmental liabilities caused by vandals.  Terrorism coverage is also available with the ERMI HNW Pollution Program.

    6) Professional Liability

    Many HNW individuals hold board positions on for-profit, nonprofit and not-for-profit boards, yet the majority of individuals do not know if they’re protected with professional liability coverage.

    If they know coverage is provided, the majority do not know the policy limits or terms and conditions. It is imperative that anyone who holds a board position understands their personal risk exposures and the insurance protection available to them.

    7) Ownership of Assets

    HNW individuals tend to own assets in the names of trusts, LLC and other legal entities. It is critical that they understand the ownership structures of all assets and that all insurance policies are coordinated to properly cover all necessary policies. 

    Simply due to their ownership of assets, HNW insureds are impacted by a cornucopia of environmental exposures such as, Pollution from neighboring properties migrating onto yours;  Real estate tenants using or storing environmentally sensitive materials, chemicals, waste….;  Mold;  Real estate with historical environmental problems;  New Construction and remodeling;  Air craft, auto, water craft storage / use / maintenance;   Privately owned businesses with environmental exposures due to operations or products produced (i.e. golf courses, agricultural / ranching, manufacturing, hotels / resorts, auto dealer and repair facilities, marinas…);  Vendors such as contractors (i.e. HVAC, electrical, plumbing, painting, septic), domestic help, landscapers / maintenance, pool cleaning / maintenance, caterers, boat captains, aircraft pilots…);  Storm water runoff;  Leaks from elevator hydraulic fluid storage tanks;  Impacting sensitive areas such as wetlands or endangered species;  Natural resource damages;   Sick building syndrome;  Above ground or underground storage tanks;  Adverse reactions and interactions of chemical compounds that accidentally commingle during a fire;  Farm/garden/lawn fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides…;  Easements (utilities, oil, gas…) that cross your property which may leak or spill hazardous materials;  Fuel for backup power generators;  Asbestos; Lead;  Vandalism;  Vapor intrusion….

  • Yacht Fire

    The fact is, simply do to their resources, High Net Worth (HNW) insureds are impacted by a wealth of environmental exposures.  Until Environmental Risk Managers, Inc. (ERMI) introduced their HNW pollution program, self-insurance was basically the only option for HNW insureds in addressing their environmental exposures.

    As the links below point out, a yacht owner is now paying legal fees to try to be made whole from a fire loss to his $24,000,000 yacht while it was in dry dock for repairs.  While the insurance carrier is denying coverage, had this insured had an ERMI HNW insurance pollution policy they could have been covered for the pollution caused by the fire along with legal fees, clean up, third party bodily injury, third party property damage, third party business income, natural resource damages and much more.

    While the shipyard where the work was being performed settled with the yacht owner for $9,200,000, the company that caused the loss has closed and its owners have fled the country.

    Do you know if your HNW insureds like self-insuring their environmental exposure or would they prefer to transfer their environmental exposure for fractions of a cent on the dollar to the ERMI HNW pollution program?  Have you asked?

    http://riskandinsurance.com/24-million-yacht-burns-owner-ignores-key-policy-terms-and-conditions/

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-11/why-are-all-these-superyachts-catching-on-fire

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v_wptmnS-k

    https://yachtharbour.com/news/31m-superyacht-ordisi-catches-fire-in-alicante-2338

  • Chip and Joanna Gaines “Fixer Upper” Lead Paint Violation

    Simply due to their resources, High Net Worth (HNW) insureds are impacted by a cornucopia of environmental exposures. One example, the Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule impacts HNW insureds that own property (homes, commercial buildings…) built prior to 1978. Lead based paint was banned in 1978. The RRP rule is designed to minimize the risk to lead based paint during renovations.

    You want to make sure that HNW insureds that own pre-1978 property only work with RRP trained contractors or they can be opening themselves up to environmental liabilities.

    As the article below points out, the EPA reached agreement with Chip & Joanna Gaines of the “Fixer Upper” show. The article highlights how Chip Gaines was caught by the EPA for doing home renovations without adequate lead paint protections as aired on the show. Magnolia Waco Properties, LLC owned by Chip & Joanna Gaines have agreed to spend $160,000 to abate lead-based paint hazards in those homes occupants are at the highest risk of exposures to dust from lead-based paint. They also agreed to a civil penalty of $40,000.

    The key point is to coach up your HNW insureds that own pre-1978 property to only use RRP trained contractors for renovations that can impact lead-based paint.

    Sears recently paid a $400,000 fine for using contractors that were not RRP trained.

    Another thing to keep in mind is the reputational risk created by environmental liabilities. As the link below states, “Through this settlement, Magnolia is putting in place safeguards to ensure the safety of its renovation work and making meaningful contributions toward the protection of children and vulnerable communities from exposure to lead-based paint.” Not good PR for your HNW insureds.

    Environmental Risk Managers HNW Pollution Insurance program protects your insureds properties far beyond just mold coverage offered in many HNW property policies. Environmental exposures such as asbestos, storm water runoff, vapor intrusion, leaking storage tanks used for back up power generators, leaks from Hydraulic tanks used for elevators, pollution form neighboring property contaminating HNW insureds property, sick building syndrome, legionnaires, pool chemicals, fertilizers, herbicides….

    https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-reaches-settlement-magnolia-homes-alleged-lead-paint-violations-during-renovations

  • Chip and Joanna Gaines “Fixer Upper” Lead Paint Violation

    Simply due to their resources, High Net Worth (HNW) insureds are impacted by a cornucopia of environmental exposures.  One example, the Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule impacts HNW insureds that own property (homes, commercial buildings…) built prior to 1978.  Lead based paint was banned in 1978.  The RRP rule is designed to minimize the risk to lead based paint during renovations.

    You want to make sure that HNW insureds that own pre-1978 property only work with RRP trained contractors or they can be opening themselves up to environmental liabilities.

    As the article below points out, the EPA reached agreement with Chip & Joanna Gaines of the “Fixer Upper” show.  The article highlights how Chip Gaines was caught by the EPA for doing home renovations without adequate lead paint protections as aired on the show.  Magnolia Waco Properties, LLC owned by Chip & Joanna Gaines have agreed to spend $160,000 to abate lead-based paint hazards in those homes occupants are at the highest risk of exposures to dust from lead-based paint.  They also agreed to a civil penalty of $40,000.

    The key point is to coach up your HNW insureds that own pre-1978 property to only use RRP trained contractors for renovations that can impact lead-based paint.

    Sears recently paid a $400,000 fine for using contractors that were not RRP trained.

    Another thing to keep in mind is the reputational risk created by environmental liabilities.  As the link below states, “Through this settlement, Magnolia is putting in place safeguards to ensure the safety of its renovation work and making meaningful contributions toward the protection of children and vulnerable communities from exposure to lead-based paint.”  Not good PR for your HNW insureds.

    Environmental Risk Managers HNW Pollution Insurance program protects your insureds properties far beyond just mold coverage offered in many HNW property policies.  Environmental exposures such as asbestos, storm water runoff, vapor intrusion, leaking storage tanks used for back up power generators, leaks from Hydraulic tanks used for elevators, pollution form neighboring property contaminating HNW insureds property, sick building syndrome, legionnaires, pool chemicals, fertilizers, herbicides….

    https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-reaches-settlement-magnolia-homes-alleged-lead-paint-violations-during-renovations

  • TEAMing with Accountants to Drive Insurance Sales

    Offering assurance on a client’s financial position is the foundation of an Accounts business model.  The Accounting profession offers various levels of assurance from an Audited financial statement, Reviewed or Compilation.

    After going through their defined process, Accounts offer an opinion whether the financial statements are accurate and free of material misstatements.  The Accountants work is designed to enhance the degree of confidence regarding a client’s financial position.

    Government regulation has and continues to have, a huge impact upon the Accounting profession.  Environmental government regulations such as SOX, SAB 92 Ruling, FIN 47, GASB 49…, can have major impacts on an Accountant’s work.  Make a mistake and an Accountants E&O can take a hit.

    Not only must accountants attest to the fairness and accuracy of recorded environmental exposures, but they must be aware of possible unknown environmental liabilities.  As environmental exposures and related costs grow in dollar size and public awareness, Accounting Professionals must be prepared, in some cases required, to incorporate environmental impacts into financial reports and decisions.

    In today’s transparent business environment, the problem created by a traditional Accountant’s work, is not making sure there is a financial assurance mechanism in place to backstop potential environmental liabilities.  One environmental liability can render an Account’s work not worth the paper it’s written on unless there is an environmental financial assurance mechanism.

    As more accountants understand the environmental financial assurance gap not addressed in their work, I am sure most will make environmental financial assurance part of every Audit, Review or Compilation.

    The correlation to this is the transformation banks made to their business model in the 1990’s, once they understood how environmental due diligence granted them the Lender Liability Defense for collateralized properties.  It took numerous times where a client’s environmental problem became a banks environmental problem, before banks woke up to the reality of the environmental gap created by their lending practices.

    Just to make sure we are on the same page, Environmental Financial Assurance is nothing new, it’s been around for decades.  Under Federal law, regulated Underground Storage Tanks Owners must evidence financial assurance to put fuel in their tanks.  Industrial and hazardous waste haulers must evidence financial assurance before they can move one load of waste.  Asbestos and lead abatement contractors must evidence financial assurance before they can remediate asbestos or lead.  Landfills must evidence financial assurance before they can accept any waste….

    There are various forms of environmental financial assurance, i.e. Bond, Letter of Credit, Insurance, Monies in Escrow, Captive, Risk Retention Group….

    As with banks, Accountants have learned, when it comes to environmental liabilities, a client’s environmental problem can become the Accountants problem.  As part of “Best Practices”, Accountants must incorporate coaching their clients on the value an environmental financial assurance mechanism (Bond, Letter of Credit, Environmental Insurance, Monies in Escrow…) adds to their business model.

    Environmental financial assurance mechanisms also help to reduce the reputational risk associated with environmental liabilities while protecting the Accountants bottom line.

    In today’s transparent business environment, Accountants must have a working knowledge of managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures as part of “Best Practices” or face prosecution, reputational risks and / or extinction.  I can remember when there were the “Big 8” Accounting firms.

    Environmental Coaching Tips For Adding Accountants To Your TEAM

    1. What is a “Pollutant”?  You need to make sure Accountants have a clear understanding of what a “Pollutant” is.  If you look at an environmental indemnification in a contract, it generally describes a Pollutant as smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids….  However, due to the way courts and insurance companies have responded to lawsuits and insurance claims, environmental Strategist™ (eS) has developed a definition that is easier to understand.  eS define a “Pollutant” as a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.” In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong can be a Pollutant.  eS have examples where fresh water, milk, cheese, fruit, beer and more have all been defined as a “Pollutant”.
    2. Every business is impacted by environmental exposures.
    3. Environmental liabilities tend to be a severity versus frequency issue.
    4. Environmental Accounting is one of the fastest growing fields in the Accounting profession. This is partly due to Government regulations.  Environmental accounting attempts to assure that current accounting methods are not contributing to or offering misleading signals.  e.  Is a business’s success achieved at the expense of the environment or does the success of a business make a net contribution to the betterment of our environment?  Environmental accounting looks to balance or at least upgrade the dangers caused by current accounting methods and reduce misleading signals in their Accounting profession.

    A correlation to this is the Federal Government coming out with “All Appropriate Inquiry”, to upgrade the ASTM Phase I, II… site assessments.  We must remember; environmental issues are relatively new to business and society, so we must expect as we grow and learn more, that change is inevitable.  As I like to say, “Change is the only constant, in the environmental industry”.

    ERMI TEAM building strategy:  Start by working with Environmental Accountants or Accounting firms that incorporate environmental accounting because they are coached up on the value environmental financial assurance offers their client’s.  Like most business professionals, Accountants like to work with client’s that can pay their accounting bill.  My experience is, most Accounts are not aware of the various environmental insurance products available and the financial assurances they afford.

    1. When it comes to environmental liability insurance as a financial assurance mechanism, three often overlooked benefits offered in policies are:
    2. Defense Costs: Environmental liabilities are relatively new and very litigious.  Even if you do nothing wrong, you can still get named in a suit and must expense legal fees.  Environmental insurance policies cover defense costs.
    3. Claim Management: All policies come with specialists to assist you in handling a claim.  Who’s in charge of communications, public relations, emergency response, government compliance, financial management, third party claims for bodily injury, property damage, natural resource damages….?
    4. Third Party Liabilities: The majority of the time the cost to clean up the environmental problem/s is far less than the associated claims that come in from third parties for bodily injury, property damage and business interruption.

    Environmental Liability Insurance For Accountants To Coach Their Client’s

    Since every business is impacted by environmental exposures, consideration needs to be given to the economies of scale afforded with environmental liability insurance, versus other financial assurance instruments or self-insuring.

    Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL)

    EIL is site pollution coverage for property owners susceptible to economic loss caused by pollution that actually or allegedly originated from scheduled properties of the insured.  Sometimes referred to as Pollution Legal Liability (PLL), this coverage is for those who own, operate, lease, or have any other insurable interest in real property and/or the operations. Coverage can be written in a variety of ways addressing unknown preexisting conditions or new conditions.  Coverage can include third party bodily injury and property damage along with business interruption and extra expense, on and off-site cleanup costs, legal defense expenses, non-owned disposal sites, transportation and more. EIL can be offered on multiyear terms.  Most EIL policies cover above ground storage tanks up to a certain size.  Scheduled Underground Storage Tanks can be covered on EIL policies.  You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.

    Property Transfer Coverage

    When buying or selling property there can be unknown preexisting environmental conditions. Since environmental due diligence (Phase I, Phase II…), cannot guarantee uncovering all potential environmental liabilities, insurance companies have created property transfer insurance. This coverage protects the new owner or any party with an insurable interest, against unknown environmental conditions that may be discovered during the policy period, that were not caused by the new owner.

    This coverage not only helps to keep the property at its maximum value, it will assist the purchaser in being able to secure the necessary financing to complete their transaction.  You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.  Coverage is generally written on a multi-year term (i.e. 3, 5, 7… years).

    Mergers, Acquisitions & Pollution Protection (MAPP)

    Key to any acquisition is the correct valuation and effective due diligence and MAPP operates as a backstop against issues due diligence or valuation processes may not be able to identify.

    As a financial assurance mechanism for M&A’s, pollution liability insurance has become part of “Best Practices”.  Representation & Warranties (R&W) insurance is proving its value for M&A’s much the same as pollution liability insurance has.

    R&W insurance is designed expressly to provide insurance coverage for the breach of a representation or a warranty contained in a Buy / Sell Agreement, in addition to or as a replacement for all or most of the seller’s contractual representations and warranties.

    MAPP delivers a cost-effective way to transfer R&W and pollution liabilities to a financially stable third party.

    Brownfield Redevelopment Insurance

    Today, more than ever, Federal, State and local governments are creating incentives for redevelopment of Brownfield sites. These are properties that due to actual or perceived contamination are sitting idle or underutilized. Through Brownfield redevelopment these properties can be cleaned up and put back on the tax rolls.

    The basic purpose of this insurance is to protect the owners, purchaser or investors against known or unknown environmental conditions. Brownfield redevelopment insurance can be structured in a variety of ways. Besides the financial assurance mechanism, contractor’s pollution liability, transportation, off-site disposal, cost cap insurance, post remediation coverage and much more can be addressed. The important thing to remember about Brownfield redevelopment coverage is that it is customized for each project.

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) insurance protects the insured should they cause or exacerbate an environmental condition while performing their contractor services.  CPL protects the insured for covered operations performed by or on behalf of the insured, while operating away from any premises they own, rent, lease or occupy.

    CPL can be offered on claims made or occurrence basis.  Coverage can be written on a job specific basis, blanket basis to cover all the work performed by the insured or Owner Controlled.  Most policies can be endorsed to cover transportation pollution liability, mold, lead, and asbestos, defense outside the limits, off-site disposal coverage, and more. Contractors incorporating CPL coverage as part of their risk transfer strategy, drive their growth and profits by marketing the benefits CPL coverage affords in reducing job interruption due to environmental issues.  A major environmental liability exposure faced by all contactors lies in who they are doing business with.  If there is an environmental loss at a job site, innocent contractors can and do get named in lawsuits.  Do your subs/vendors have CPL insurance if they cause an environmental loss?

    Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many more, have paid multimillion dollar fines for contractors they hired that caused environmental liabilities.  They now require CPL for contractors doing work for them to avoid paying on liabilities created by their vendor contractors.

    Professional Liability

    The absolute pollution exclusion in a standard commercial general liability policy excludes sudden and accidental, and gradual pollution losses due to the release of “solid, liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritants or contaminants, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acid, alkalis, chemicals and waste”….  Engineering firms who work in solving environmental exposures faced by their clients need to have coverage for negligent acts, errors or omissions that may result in damages caused by pollution conditions.

    There are various ways coverage can be written to protect the engineering firm and their clients. Professional liability on a standalone basis or professional liability including general liability (GL) is available. For engineering firms that may also get involved in doing hands on work at the job site, they can add to the coverage contractors pollution liability (CPL) insurance, (refer to contractors pollution liability insurance for more details). Coverage for the professional liability is done on a claims made basis. For the GL and CPL, coverage can be on a claims made or occurrence form basis.

    You have to also keep in mind there are contractors that in the performance of their work may act in a consultants or engineers capacity. You need to make sure you offer your client the broadest program available to meet their business model.

    Transportation Pollution Liability (TPL)

    Generally, Business Auto or Truckers policies will exclude pollution losses arising from spills or other releases of their cargo. Broadened auto pollution liability (typically Form CA 9948) affords coverage during the loading, unloading and transportation, for a spill, release or sudden upset and over turn of transported cargo.  Make sure you do not confuse the MCS-90 endorsement as being TPL coverage, it is not and the insurance carrier reserves the right to subrogate back against the insured for cost to clean up a release of the transported cargo.

    Coaching up Accountants how pollution insurance can protect their client’s, while better protecting their E&O and bottom line, will drive the sales of your insurance products.

  • TEAMing with Accountants to Drive Insurance Sales

    Offering assurance on a client’s financial position is the foundation of an Accounts business model.  The Accounting profession offers various levels of assurance from an Audited financial statement, Reviewed or Compilation.

    After going through their defined process, Accounts offer an opinion whether the financial statements are accurate and free of material misstatements.  The Accountants work is designed to enhance the degree of confidence regarding a client’s financial position.

    Government regulation has and continues to have, a huge impact upon the Accounting profession.  Environmental government regulations such as SOX, SAB 92 Ruling, FIN 47, GASB 49…, can have major impacts on an Accountant’s work.  Make a mistake and an Accountants E&O can take a hit.

    Not only must accountants attest to the fairness and accuracy of recorded environmental exposures, but they must be aware of possible unknown environmental liabilities.  As environmental exposures and related costs grow in dollar size and public awareness, Accounting Professionals must be prepared, in some cases required, to incorporate environmental impacts into financial reports and decisions.

    In today’s transparent business environment, the problem created by a traditional Accountant’s work, is not making sure there is a financial assurance mechanism in place to backstop potential environmental liabilities.  One environmental liability can render an Account’s work not worth the paper it’s written on unless there is an environmental financial assurance mechanism.

    As more accountants understand the environmental financial assurance gap not addressed in their work, I am sure most will make environmental financial assurance part of every Audit, Review or Compilation.

    The correlation to this is the transformation banks made to their business model in the 1990’s, once they understood how environmental due diligence granted them the Lender Liability Defense for collateralized properties.  It took numerous times where a client’s environmental problem became a banks environmental problem, before banks woke up to the reality of the environmental gap created by their lending practices.

    Just to make sure we are on the same page, Environmental Financial Assurance is nothing new, it’s been around for decades.  Under Federal law, regulated Underground Storage Tanks Owners must evidence financial assurance to put fuel in their tanks.  Industrial and hazardous waste haulers must evidence financial assurance before they can move one load of waste.  Asbestos and lead abatement contractors must evidence financial assurance before they can remediate asbestos or lead.  Landfills must evidence financial assurance before they can accept any waste….

    There are various forms of environmental financial assurance, i.e. Bond, Letter of Credit, Insurance, Monies in Escrow, Captive, Risk Retention Group….

    As with banks, Accountants have learned, when it comes to environmental liabilities, a client’s environmental problem can become the Accountants problem.  As part of “Best Practices”, Accountants must incorporate coaching their clients on the value an environmental financial assurance mechanism (Bond, Letter of Credit, Environmental Insurance, Monies in Escrow…) adds to their business model.

    Environmental financial assurance mechanisms also help to reduce the reputational risk associated with environmental liabilities while protecting the Accountants bottom line.

    In today’s transparent business environment, Accountants must have a working knowledge of managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures as part of “Best Practices” or face prosecution, reputational risks and / or extinction.  I can remember when there were the “Big 8” Accounting firms.

    Environmental Coaching Tips For Adding Accountants To Your TEAM

    1. What is a “Pollutant”?  You need to make sure Accountants have a clear understanding of what a “Pollutant” is.  If you look at an environmental indemnification in a contract, it generally describes a Pollutant as smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids….  However, due to the way courts and insurance companies have responded to lawsuits and insurance claims, environmental Strategist™ (eS) has developed a definition that is easier to understand.  eS define a “Pollutant” as a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.” In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong can be a Pollutant.  eS have examples where fresh water, milk, cheese, fruit, beer and more have all been defined as a “Pollutant”.
    2. Every business is impacted by environmental exposures.
    3. Environmental liabilities tend to be a severity versus frequency issue.
    4. Environmental Accounting is one of the fastest growing fields in the Accounting profession. This is partly due to Government regulations.  Environmental accounting attempts to assure that current accounting methods are not contributing to or offering misleading signals.  e.  Is a business’s success achieved at the expense of the environment or does the success of a business make a net contribution to the betterment of our environment?  Environmental accounting looks to balance or at least upgrade the dangers caused by current accounting methods and reduce misleading signals in their Accounting profession.

    A correlation to this is the Federal Government coming out with “All Appropriate Inquiry”, to upgrade the ASTM Phase I, II… site assessments.  We must remember; environmental issues are relatively new to business and society, so we must expect as we grow and learn more, that change is inevitable.  As I like to say, “Change is the only constant, in the environmental industry”.

    ERMI TEAM building strategy:  Start by working with Environmental Accountants or Accounting firms that incorporate environmental accounting because they are coached up on the value environmental financial assurance offers their client’s.  Like most business professionals, Accountants like to work with client’s that can pay their accounting bill.  My experience is, most Accounts are not aware of the various environmental insurance products available and the financial assurances they afford.

    1. When it comes to environmental liability insurance as a financial assurance mechanism, three often overlooked benefits offered in policies are:
    2. Defense Costs: Environmental liabilities are relatively new and very litigious.  Even if you do nothing wrong, you can still get named in a suit and must expense legal fees.  Environmental insurance policies cover defense costs.
    3. Claim Management: All policies come with specialists to assist you in handling a claim.  Who’s in charge of communications, public relations, emergency response, government compliance, financial management, third party claims for bodily injury, property damage, natural resource damages….?
    4. Third Party Liabilities: The majority of the time the cost to clean up the environmental problem/s is far less than the associated claims that come in from third parties for bodily injury, property damage and business interruption.

    Environmental Liability Insurance For Accountants To Coach Their Client’s

    Since every business is impacted by environmental exposures, consideration needs to be given to the economies of scale afforded with environmental liability insurance, versus other financial assurance instruments or self-insuring.

    Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL)

    EIL is site pollution coverage for property owners susceptible to economic loss caused by pollution that actually or allegedly originated from scheduled properties of the insured.  Sometimes referred to as Pollution Legal Liability (PLL), this coverage is for those who own, operate, lease, or have any other insurable interest in real property and/or the operations. Coverage can be written in a variety of ways addressing unknown preexisting conditions or new conditions.  Coverage can include third party bodily injury and property damage along with business interruption and extra expense, on and off-site cleanup costs, legal defense expenses, non-owned disposal sites, transportation and more. EIL can be offered on multiyear terms.  Most EIL policies cover above ground storage tanks up to a certain size.  Scheduled Underground Storage Tanks can be covered on EIL policies.  You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.

    Property Transfer Coverage

    When buying or selling property there can be unknown preexisting environmental conditions. Since environmental due diligence (Phase I, Phase II…), cannot guarantee uncovering all potential environmental liabilities, insurance companies have created property transfer insurance. This coverage protects the new owner or any party with an insurable interest, against unknown environmental conditions that may be discovered during the policy period, that were not caused by the new owner.

    This coverage not only helps to keep the property at its maximum value, it will assist the purchaser in being able to secure the necessary financing to complete their transaction.  You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.  Coverage is generally written on a multi-year term (i.e. 3, 5, 7… years).

    Mergers, Acquisitions & Pollution Protection (MAPP)

    Key to any acquisition is the correct valuation and effective due diligence and MAPP operates as a backstop against issues due diligence or valuation processes may not be able to identify.

    As a financial assurance mechanism for M&A’s, pollution liability insurance has become part of “Best Practices”.  Representation & Warranties (R&W) insurance is proving its value for M&A’s much the same as pollution liability insurance has.

    R&W insurance is designed expressly to provide insurance coverage for the breach of a representation or a warranty contained in a Buy / Sell Agreement, in addition to or as a replacement for all or most of the seller’s contractual representations and warranties.

    MAPP delivers a cost-effective way to transfer R&W and pollution liabilities to a financially stable third party.

    Brownfield Redevelopment Insurance

    Today, more than ever, Federal, State and local governments are creating incentives for redevelopment of Brownfield sites. These are properties that due to actual or perceived contamination are sitting idle or underutilized. Through Brownfield redevelopment these properties can be cleaned up and put back on the tax rolls.

    The basic purpose of this insurance is to protect the owners, purchaser or investors against known or unknown environmental conditions. Brownfield redevelopment insurance can be structured in a variety of ways. Besides the financial assurance mechanism, contractor’s pollution liability, transportation, off-site disposal, cost cap insurance, post remediation coverage and much more can be addressed. The important thing to remember about Brownfield redevelopment coverage is that it is customized for each project.

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) insurance protects the insured should they cause or exacerbate an environmental condition while performing their contractor services.  CPL protects the insured for covered operations performed by or on behalf of the insured, while operating away from any premises they own, rent, lease or occupy.

    CPL can be offered on claims made or occurrence basis.  Coverage can be written on a job specific basis, blanket basis to cover all the work performed by the insured or Owner Controlled.  Most policies can be endorsed to cover transportation pollution liability, mold, lead, and asbestos, defense outside the limits, off-site disposal coverage, and more. Contractors incorporating CPL coverage as part of their risk transfer strategy, drive their growth and profits by marketing the benefits CPL coverage affords in reducing job interruption due to environmental issues.  A major environmental liability exposure faced by all contactors lies in who they are doing business with.  If there is an environmental loss at a job site, innocent contractors can and do get named in lawsuits.  Do your subs/vendors have CPL insurance if they cause an environmental loss?

    Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many more, have paid multimillion dollar fines for contractors they hired that caused environmental liabilities.  They now require CPL for contractors doing work for them to avoid paying on liabilities created by their vendor contractors.

    Professional Liability

    The absolute pollution exclusion in a standard commercial general liability policy excludes sudden and accidental, and gradual pollution losses due to the release of “solid, liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritants or contaminants, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acid, alkalis, chemicals and waste”….  Engineering firms who work in solving environmental exposures faced by their clients need to have coverage for negligent acts, errors or omissions that may result in damages caused by pollution conditions.

    There are various ways coverage can be written to protect the engineering firm and their clients. Professional liability on a standalone basis or professional liability including general liability (GL) is available. For engineering firms that may also get involved in doing hands on work at the job site, they can add to the coverage contractors pollution liability (CPL) insurance, (refer to contractors pollution liability insurance for more details). Coverage for the professional liability is done on a claims made basis. For the GL and CPL, coverage can be on a claims made or occurrence form basis.

    You have to also keep in mind there are contractors that in the performance of their work may act in a consultants or engineers capacity. You need to make sure you offer your client the broadest program available to meet their business model.

    Transportation Pollution Liability (TPL)

    Generally, Business Auto or Truckers policies will exclude pollution losses arising from spills or other releases of their cargo. Broadened auto pollution liability (typically Form CA 9948) affords coverage during the loading, unloading and transportation, for a spill, release or sudden upset and over turn of transported cargo.  Make sure you do not confuse the MCS-90 endorsement as being TPL coverage, it is not and the insurance carrier reserves the right to subrogate back against the insured for cost to clean up a release of the transported cargo.

    Coaching up Accountants how pollution insurance can protect their client’s, while better protecting their E&O and bottom line, will drive the sales of your insurance products.

  • TEAMing with Attorney’s To Drive Insurance Sales

    Of all the “business professionals” (i.e. attorney’s, accountant’s, banker’s, realtor’s, environmental engineers) we are highlighting in the ERMI TEAMing with “Business Professionals” series, attorneys represent the lowest hanging fruit for insurance professionals to TEAM with.

    There are several reasons for this which we will cover in this competitive environmental intelligence but mainly, attorneys tend to specialize in specific areas of law, i.e. general business, estate planning, bankruptcy, patent / trademark, environmental, criminal, international, employee, civil…  This means an attorney is well versed in their specific area of law but possess very little knowledge about assisting their clients to manage and transfer their environmental exposures.  Note:  As highlighted in Series #1, TEAMing With “Business Professionals”, every business and individual is impacted by environmental exposures.

    Historically, once an environmentally reactive business / individual calls their attorney to assist them with an environmental liability, the attorney brings in their firm’s environmental specialist to address the issue.  This business model will generally lead to some form of litigation and what attorney’s clients have learned over the years about environmental litigation is its very time consuming, stresses resources and desired results are generally not achieved

    Insurance professionals are not going to fix a broken business model overnight, but you can fill a huge gap in most attorney’s work, lack of financial assurance to backstop their legal documents.  In today’s business environment, the name of the game for attorney’s is avoid litigation to grow their client base and business.  Insurance professionals are armed with an arsenal of products to assist attorneys to grow their business model.

    The bottom line, today’s transparent business environment has changed the way Attorney’s must address environmental exposures impacting their client’s which means opportunity for insurance professionals.

    Note:  Education is a vital component to building a TEAM relationship with “Business Professionals”.  Throughout the ERMI “Business Professionals” series we will offer coaching tips to assist you in building your relationships with “Business Professionals”.

    ERMI TEAM Relationship Coaching Tip:  In some contracts, attorney’s will require financial assurance to backstop indemnifications contained in the contract.  They will generally achieve this utilizing standard property and casualty and environmental insurances with coverage being evidenced by a certificate of insurance.  The problem this strategy presents in relation to environmental insurance is, an environmental insurance policy will not be issued without the insurance carrier first receiving a completed and signed “warranty” insurance application.  In general terms the application will state that the environmental insurance policy is being issued based upon the signed “warranty” application and that the application will become part of the policy.  The application goes on to say at the time of a loss if it’s discovered the application is not accurate, the insurance carrier can deny coverage.  Without first confirming the “warranty” application is accurately filled out the certificate of insurance may not be worth the paper it is written on and the same is true for the attorney’s financial assurances contained in the contract.  Coaching attorneys to understand warranty applications will fill a gap in their financial assurance strategy in contracts and a gigantic hole in their E&O exposure.

    To support the above statements let’s look at another example.  For years, attorneys have utilized environmental indemnifications in real estate Buy / Sell Agreements, mergers and acquisitions and many other legal instruments.  Generally speaking, attorneys feel content with addressing potential environmental exposures by simply utilizing environmental indemnifications in legal instruments and not backing them up with a financial assurance mechanism (i.e. bond, letter of credit, monies on deposit, insurance).

    Today we know the problems created by this mindset and the fact that environmental indemnifications are a very cursory way of addressing environmental exposures in legal transactions.

    ERMI TEAM Relationship Coaching Tip:  Environmental insurance policies pay for defense costs.  Do you think an attorney would rather collect their fees from a financially solvent insurance carrier or a client that just found out they have contaminated half their towns drinking water?

    For decades, our Federal Government has utilized financial assurance requirements for asbestos and lead abatement contractors, regulated underground storage tanks, hazardous & industrial waste haulers, Landfills…, so why not more attorney’s?

    Insurance professionals have a variety of financial assurance products to assist attorneys to reduce their E&O exposure, one of which is pollution liability insurance.  TEAMing with ERMI will allow you access to the full menu of the environmental insurance products offered by the major environmental insurance carriers.

    ERMI TEAM Coaching Tip:  Talking points with attorney’s.

    To understand why “Best Practices” for attorneys means moving beyond their current litigious business model to possessing a working knowledge of managing and transferring environmental exposures, we first must be on the same page about a few environmental facts.

    1. What is a “Pollutant”? If you look at an environmental indemnification in a contract, it generally describes a Pollutant as smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids…..  However, due to the way courts and insurance companies have responded to lawsuits and insurance claims, environmental Strategist™ (eS) has developed a definition that is easier to understand.  eS define a “Pollutant” as a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.” In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong can be a pollutant.  eS have examples where fresh water, milk, cheese, fruit, beer and more have all been defined as a “Pollutant”.
    2. Law firms generally utilize specially trained environmental attorney’s to address their client’s environmental exposures when in reality their biggest environmental exposures are with their other legal specialist’s i.e. general business, health, international, labor, estate planning, merger & acquisition, real estate…. In short, nearly every attorney must possess a working knowledge of proactively addressing their client’s environmental exposures.  TEAMing with ERMI insurance professionals can do this.  In short, you become the law firms backroom environmental risk manager on managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures.
    3. Historically, attorneys have made their money by addressing past environmental problems such as asbestos, lead, mold and so much more. This reactive approach has cost attorneys time, resources, client relationships and much more.  TEAMing with ERMI we can coach attorney’s on proactively managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures to increase productivity and profits while reducing their E&O exposure.
    4. The inability of at fault parties to meet environmental indemnifications in contracts is a reputational and liability risk for attorney’s. Attorneys not practicing environmental “Best Practices” may find their E&O insurance at risk of claims from disgruntled client’s.

    ERMI TEAM Coaching Tip:  You would be amazed how many contracts Environmental Risk Managers (ERMI) reviews that an attorney constructed requiring the wrong pollution insurance.  On almost a weekly basis ERMI will assist an attorney with correcting their contract to make sure the proper pollution insurance is being requested and put into place.  TEAMing with ERMI we can make sure your legal TEAM members are not opening themselves up to an E&O exposure by requesting the improper environmental insurance.

    Today’s business environment is demanding attorneys know if their work is preserving an asset or creating an environmental liability for their client and themselves.  Insurance professionals TEAMing with attorney’s to manage and transfer the attorney’s clients environmental exposures will position themselves as a trusted advisor and strategic partner while driving the sales of their insurance products.

    In Environmental Risk Managers “Business Professionals” Series #3 we will strategize on TEAM building with Bankers / Financial Institutions.

  • TEAMing with Attorney’s To Drive Insurance Sales

    Of all the “business professionals” (i.e. attorney’s, accountant’s, banker’s, realtor’s, environmental engineers) we are highlighting in the ERMI TEAMing with “Business Professionals” series, attorneys represent the lowest hanging fruit for insurance professionals to TEAM with.

    There are several reasons for this which we will cover in this competitive environmental intelligence but mainly, attorneys tend to specialize in specific areas of law, i.e. general business, estate planning, bankruptcy, patent / trademark, environmental, criminal, international, employee, civil…  This means an attorney is well versed in their specific area of law but possess very little knowledge about assisting their clients to manage and transfer their environmental exposures.  Note:  As highlighted in Series #1, TEAMing With “Business Professionals”, every business and individual is impacted by environmental exposures.

    Historically, once an environmentally reactive business / individual calls their attorney to assist them with an environmental liability, the attorney brings in their firm’s environmental specialist to address the issue.  This business model will generally lead to some form of litigation and what attorney’s clients have learned over the years about environmental litigation is its very time consuming, stresses resources and desired results are generally not achieved

    Insurance professionals are not going to fix a broken business model overnight, but you can fill a huge gap in most attorney’s work, lack of financial assurance to backstop their legal documents.  In today’s business environment, the name of the game for attorney’s is avoid litigation to grow their client base and business.  Insurance professionals are armed with an arsenal of products to assist attorneys to grow their business model.

    The bottom line, today’s transparent business environment has changed the way Attorney’s must address environmental exposures impacting their client’s which means opportunity for insurance professionals.

    Note:  Education is a vital component to building a TEAM relationship with “Business Professionals”.  Throughout the ERMI “Business Professionals” series we will offer coaching tips to assist you in building your relationships with “Business Professionals”.

    ERMI TEAM Relationship Coaching Tip:  In some contracts, attorney’s will require financial assurance to backstop indemnifications contained in the contract.  They will generally achieve this utilizing standard property and casualty and environmental insurances with coverage being evidenced by a certificate of insurance.  The problem this strategy presents in relation to environmental insurance is, an environmental insurance policy will not be issued without the insurance carrier first receiving a completed and signed “warranty” insurance application.  In general terms the application will state that the environmental insurance policy is being issued based upon the signed “warranty” application and that the application will become part of the policy.  The application goes on to say at the time of a loss if it’s discovered the application is not accurate, the insurance carrier can deny coverage.  Without first confirming the “warranty” application is accurately filled out the certificate of insurance may not be worth the paper it is written on and the same is true for the attorney’s financial assurances contained in the contract.  Coaching attorneys to understand warranty applications will fill a gap in their financial assurance strategy in contracts and a gigantic hole in their E&O exposure.

    To support the above statements let’s look at another example.  For years, attorneys have utilized environmental indemnifications in real estate Buy / Sell Agreements, mergers and acquisitions and many other legal instruments.  Generally speaking, attorneys feel content with addressing potential environmental exposures by simply utilizing environmental indemnifications in legal instruments and not backing them up with a financial assurance mechanism (i.e. bond, letter of credit, monies on deposit, insurance).

    Today we know the problems created by this mindset and the fact that environmental indemnifications are a very cursory way of addressing environmental exposures in legal transactions.

    ERMI TEAM Relationship Coaching Tip:  Environmental insurance policies pay for defense costs.  Do you think an attorney would rather collect their fees from a financially solvent insurance carrier or a client that just found out they have contaminated half their towns drinking water?

    For decades, our Federal Government has utilized financial assurance requirements for asbestos and lead abatement contractors, regulated underground storage tanks, hazardous & industrial waste haulers, Landfills…, so why not more attorney’s?

    Insurance professionals have a variety of financial assurance products to assist attorneys to reduce their E&O exposure, one of which is pollution liability insurance.  TEAMing with ERMI will allow you access to the full menu of the environmental insurance products offered by the major environmental insurance carriers.

    ERMI TEAM Coaching Tip:  Talking points with attorney’s.

    To understand why “Best Practices” for attorneys means moving beyond their current litigious business model to possessing a working knowledge of managing and transferring environmental exposures, we first must be on the same page about a few environmental facts.

    1. What is a “Pollutant”? If you look at an environmental indemnification in a contract, it generally describes a Pollutant as smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids…..  However, due to the way courts and insurance companies have responded to lawsuits and insurance claims, environmental Strategist™ (eS) has developed a definition that is easier to understand.  eS define a “Pollutant” as a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.” In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong can be a pollutant.  eS have examples where fresh water, milk, cheese, fruit, beer and more have all been defined as a “Pollutant”.
    2. Law firms generally utilize specially trained environmental attorney’s to address their client’s environmental exposures when in reality their biggest environmental exposures are with their other legal specialist’s i.e. general business, health, international, labor, estate planning, merger & acquisition, real estate…. In short, nearly every attorney must possess a working knowledge of proactively addressing their client’s environmental exposures.  TEAMing with ERMI insurance professionals can do this.  In short, you become the law firms backroom environmental risk manager on managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures.
    3. Historically, attorneys have made their money by addressing past environmental problems such as asbestos, lead, mold and so much more. This reactive approach has cost attorneys time, resources, client relationships and much more.  TEAMing with ERMI we can coach attorney’s on proactively managing and transferring their client’s environmental exposures to increase productivity and profits while reducing their E&O exposure.
    4. The inability of at fault parties to meet environmental indemnifications in contracts is a reputational and liability risk for attorney’s. Attorneys not practicing environmental “Best Practices” may find their E&O insurance at risk of claims from disgruntled client’s.

    ERMI TEAM Coaching Tip:  You would be amazed how many contracts Environmental Risk Managers (ERMI) reviews that an attorney constructed requiring the wrong pollution insurance.  On almost a weekly basis ERMI will assist an attorney with correcting their contract to make sure the proper pollution insurance is being requested and put into place.  TEAMing with ERMI we can make sure your legal TEAM members are not opening themselves up to an E&O exposure by requesting the improper environmental insurance.

    Today’s business environment is demanding attorneys know if their work is preserving an asset or creating an environmental liability for their client and themselves.  Insurance professionals TEAMing with attorney’s to manage and transfer the attorney’s clients environmental exposures will position themselves as a trusted advisor and strategic partner while driving the sales of their insurance products.

    In Environmental Risk Managers “Business Professionals” Series #3 we will strategize on TEAM building with Bankers / Financial Institutions.

  • TEAMing with Bankers to Drive Insurance Sales

    For decades, Bankers have utilized environmental indemnifications in their loan documents as protection from environmental liabilities. Then in the mid 1990’s Phase I / II… environmental site assessments were added as another layer of defense for a Bankers lender liability exposure on real estate transactions.

    In basic terms, environmental indemnifications and Phase I’s have been used as a way for all concerned parties to feel content with addressing potential environmental exposures on financial transactions.

    Today, we know the problems created by this mindset and the fact that environmental indemnifications and Phase I’s are a very cursory way of addressing environmental exposures. Especially when you consider that environmental liabilities tend to be a severity vs frequency issue.

    As countless Banks have experienced, when it comes to environmental liabilities, a client’s environmental problem can become the Banks problem. That’s why it’s crucial for banks to have a financial assurance mechanism (Bond, Letter of Credit, Environmental Insurance, Monies in Escrow…) in place to backstop the inability of a borrower to meet environmental indemnifications.


    Environmental financial assurance mechanisms also help to reduce the reputational risk associated with environmental liabilities for Banks.
    When it comes to environmental liability insurance as a financial assurance mechanism, three often overlooked benefits offered in environmental liability insurance policies are:
    1. Defense Costs: Environmental liabilities are relatively new and very litigious. Even if you do nothing wrong, you can still get named in a suit and must expense legal fees. Environmental insurance policies cover defense costs.
    2. Claim Management: All policies come with specialists to assist you in handling a claim. Who is in charge of communications, public relations, emergency response, government compliance, financial management, third party claims for bodily injury, property damage, natural resource damages….?
    3. Third Party Liabilities: The majority of the time the cost to clean up the environmental problem/s is far less than the associated claims that come in from third parties for bodily injury, property damage and business interruption.

    Environmental Coaching Guide for Bank Professionals

    1. Bankers must first understand what a “Pollutant” is? If you look at a loan document, they generally describe a Pollutant as smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids…. However, due to the way our courts and insurance companies have responded to lawsuits and insurance claims, environmental Strategist® (eS) has developed the following simplified definition: a “Pollutant” is a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.” In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong can be a Pollutant. eS have examples where fresh water, milk, cheese, fruit, beer and more have all been defined as a “Pollutant”.
    2. Every commercial client a Bank works with is impacted by environmental exposures. What is their financial assurance mechanism?
    3. eS research has determined that fewer than 50% of Phase I Site Assessments are accurate. Also, environmental due diligence (Phase I, Phase II…) as part of meeting the innocent landowner or lender liability defense only protects the real estate owner or bank from the government. Impacted non-governmental third parties can still file suit.
    4. Banks, besides being cognizant of the environmental exposures impacting their collateralized properties, need to consider neighbors of collateralized properties. When a Phase I Site Assessment is conducted to investigate who neighbors are that could have contamination going onto a subject property, environmental engineers do a minimum of a 2-mile radius search. Third party contamination coming onto a bank collateralized property could impede the property owner’s ability to service their loan. Under Federal law the property owner is ultimately responsible for the environmental condition of their property regardless of who caused the contamination. Environmental insurance policies can protect property owners if third party contamination comes onto their property.
    5. What about bank loans for client’s that lease / rent their facility to third parties? Lease / rental agreements contain “environmental indemnifications”. What if a tenant experiences an environmental liability in the facility or a third-party vendor (HVAC contractor, Repairman, Landscapers…) contaminates the facility? Without a financial assurance mechanism in place, contracts that contain environmental indemnifications may not be worth the paper there written on.
    6. Additional environmental exposures impacting bank loans may include but are not limited to: Vapor intrusion, Storm water runoff, Natural resource damages, Easements that cross collateralized property, New construction & remodeling on collateralized properties, Sick building syndrome, Mold, Legionella….

    Bankers not proactively addressing environmental exposures may find their profits at risk when a borrower discovers they have an environmental liability. Coaching up Bankers how pollution insurance can protect them from the gaps created by environmental indemnifications in contracts and site assessments will drive the sales of your insurance products.

    Environmental Liability Insurance Coverages for Banks to Consider
    Simply due to their business model, every Bank is impacted by environmental exposures. Therefore, consideration needs to be given to the economies of scale afforded with environmental liability insurance versus self-insuring.

    Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL)

    EIL is for Banks susceptible to economic loss caused by pollution that actually or allegedly originated from owned or collateralized properties. Sometimes referred to as Pollution Legal Liability (PLL), this coverage is for those who own, operate, lease, or have any other insurable interest in real property and/or the operations. Coverage can be written in a variety of ways addressing unknown preexisting conditions or new conditions. Coverage can include third party bodily injury and property damage along with business interruption and extra expense, on and off-site cleanup costs, legal defense expenses, non-owned disposal sites, transportation and more. EIL can be offered on multiyear terms. Most EIL policies cover above ground storage tanks up to a certain size. You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.

    Lender Liability Coverage (LLC) / Secured Creditor Coverage

    As so many Banks have learned, when it comes to environmental liabilities, a client’s environmental problem can become the Banks problem.
    To address the potential environmental liabilities faced by a Bank’s operations, there is a risk transfer product called Lender Liability Coverage (LLC). LLC enables Banks to shield assets by protecting collateral and insuring for environmental liabilities arising from collateral properties. LLC fills gaps created by traditional environmental indemnifications, due diligence….

    LLC provides collateral value protection in the event of a loan default and a newly discovered pollution event at the covered location/s. When this occurs, LLC can pay the lesser of the outstanding loan balance and extra expenses or the estimated cleanup costs. LLC can be used on a single transaction or on a portfolio basis. Coverage is offered on multiyear policies that can run up to the term to maturity of the insured loan. LLC offers the ability to assign interest to a successor lien holder. LLC allows Banks to be more competitive on loans they would once be forced to pass-up due to environmental uncertainties.

    Property Transfer Coverage

    When buying or selling property there can be unknown preexisting environmental conditions. Since environmental due diligence (Phase I, Phase II…), cannot guarantee uncovering all potential environmental liabilities, insurance companies have created property transfer insurance. This coverage protects the new owner or any party with an insurable interest, against unknown environmental conditions that may be discovered during the policy period, that were not caused by the new owner.
    This coverage not only helps to keep the property at its maximum value, it will assist the purchaser in being able to secure the necessary financing to complete their transaction. You can cover multiple locations on a single policy.

    Mergers, Acquisitions & Pollution Protection (MAPP)
    Key to any acquisition is the correct valuation and effective due diligence and MAPP operates as a backstop against issues due diligence or valuation processes may not be able to identify.
    As a financial assurance mechanism for M&A’s, pollution liability insurance has become part of “Best Practices”. Representation & Warranties (R&W) insurance is proving its value for M&A’s much the same as pollution liability insurance has.
    R&W insurance is designed expressly to provide insurance coverage for the breach of a representation or a warranty contained in a Buy / Sell Agreement, in addition to or as a replacement for all or most of the seller’s contractual representations and warranties.
    MAPP delivers a cost-effective way to transfer R&W and pollution liabilities to a financially stable third party.

    Brownfield Redevelopment Insurance

    Today, more than ever, Federal, State and local governments are creating incentives for redevelopment of Brownfield sites. These are properties that due to actual or perceived contamination are sitting idle or underutilized. Through Brownfield redevelopment these properties can be cleaned up and put back on the tax rolls.
    The basic purpose of this insurance is to protect the owners, purchaser or investors against known or unknown environmental conditions. Brownfield redevelopment insurance can be structured in a variety of ways. Besides the financial assurance mechanism, contractor’s pollution liability, transportation, off-site disposal, cost cap insurance, post remediation coverage and much more can be addressed. The important thing to remember about Brownfield redevelopment coverage is that it is customized for each project.

    eS Financial Assurance Strategy for Banks: Fire Insurance policies are required by Banks that hold mortgages on properties to protect their collateral from a loss due to fire. What happens after a fire? The water and chemicals used by the fire department along with charred, toxic remnants of real and personal property can create environmental liabilities. The fire department is immune from prosecution. Under Federal law the property owner is ultimately responsible for the environmental condition of their property and fire insurance policies offer negligible limits to address cleanup. Insureds that purchase fire insurance policies need a financial assurance mechanism to address the environmental liabilities created by a fire and pollution insurance is designed to fill this critical gap.