Tag: remediation

  • Restoration Contractors 

    What is a Pollutant? 

    Any material, substance, liquid, product, etc… which is introduced into an environment for other than its intended use / purpose. In other words, something that ends up where it doesn’t belong. Fresh water, cheese, and milk have all been classified as pollutants by Insurance Carriers under various circumstances. 

    Many insureds assume that claims arising from operations are covered by the general liability policy. However, claims resulting from a “pollution incident” are excluded from most general liability policies, which leaves many of these insureds exposed to potentially uncovered claims. What pollutants are impacting your business?

    Environmental Exposures Impacting Restoration Contractors

    May include, but are not limited to: failure to identify or mischaracterize contamination during surveys; faulty design of remedial action and management plans causing bodily injury; diagnostic laboratory errors; hazardous air emission from incomplete abatement; inaccurate post-abatement certification; impacting underground structures from subsurface investigation activities; cross contamination of aquifers due to improper design, selection of materials, equipment leading to remedial system failure; improper installation and permitting of remedial systems leading to hazardous waste releases; failure to notify public and/or EPA of contamination or releases; failure to effectively monitor and maintain safe working conditions; CERCLA liability due to O&M activities at Superfund sites and from waste disposal site selection; vicarious liability due to use of subcontractors and sub-consultants;   inadequate or improper storage of samples; performance of inappropriate/incorrect tests or analytical methods;  exacerbation of preexisting contamination during excavation and cleanup efforts; inadvertent mixing of incompatible wastes; release of oils/fuels from equipment; completed operations exposures due to incomplete or improper line hookup and remedial system construction….

    Claim Scenarios

    1. A fire water restoration contractor was accused of not fully remediating the mold at a home where he was contracted to do so. After further investigation, it was found that the newly discovered mold was caused by an error made by a plumber, who has worked on the property previously. The restoration contractor was removed from the suit. However, they had already incurred over $20,000 in legal defense costs. 
    2. A homeowner hired restoration contractor to dry out a house from water damage. The contractor, without testing for asbestos, starts and finishes the dry out process, inadvertently disturbing asbestos which releases asbestos fibers into the air. After the job is complete, an industrial hygienist, hired by the homeowner, tests for asbestos and finds that it has spread throughout the house due to the dry out process. This results in cleanup costs and allegations of bodily injury resulting from asbestos inhalation, including associated legal defense expenses.

    Benefits of Environmental Liability Insurance

    Because environmental losses are a severity risk, rather than a frequency risk, the majority of restoration contractors lack the financial strength to self-insure their potential environmental liabilities. Since every restoration contractor has notable environmental exposures, consideration to the economies of scale afforded with environmental liability insurance as part of your risk transfer strategy, versus self-insuring. 

    Three Overlooked benefits of environmental liability insurance:

    1. Defense Costs:  Environmental liabilities are relatively new and very litigious.  Even if you do nothing wrong you can still get named in a suit and have to expense defense costs i.e. legal fees, environmental investigations, etc.  
    2. Claim Management:  All policies come with specialists to assist you in handling a claim.  Who is in charge of communications, public relations, emergency response, government compliance, financial management, third party claims for bodily injury, property damage, natural resource damages….?
    3. Third Party Liability:  The majority of the time the cost to clean up the environmental problem/s is far less than the associated claims that come in from third parties for bodily injury, property damage and business interruption.  You need to look at your client’s and neighbors that can be impacted if you or a sub-contractor/vendor cause an environmental loss.        

    Environmental Liability Insurance Coverages 

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) insurance protects the insured should they cause or exacerbate an environmental condition while performing their contractor services.  CPL protects the insured for covered operations performed by or on behalf of the insured, while operating away from any premises they own, rent, lease or occupy. Coverage can be written on a job specific basis, or on a blanket basis to cover all the work performed by the insured.  Most policies can be endorsed to cover transportation pollution liability, mold, lead, asbestos, defense outside the limits, off-site disposal coverage.   

    Environmental service providers incorporating CPL coverage as part of their risk transfer strategy, drive their growth and profits by marketing the benefits CPL coverage affords in reducing job interruption due to environmental issues.     

    A major environmental liability exposure faced by all contractors lies in who they are doing business with.  If there is an environmental loss at a job site, innocent contractors can and do get named in lawsuits.  Do your subs/vendors have CPL insurance if they cause an environmental loss?

    Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL) 

    EIL is for environmental service providers that own, rent, lease, operate or have any other insurable interest in real property (a fixed site facility such as a service garage and shop, transfer/recycling facility, landfill….) that can be susceptible to pollution liabilities that actually or allegedly originated from the insured property. 

    Coverage can include: Pre-existing unknown pollution, new pollution conditions, first party on-site clean up, third party bodily injury, property damage, business interruption and extra expense, off site cleanup costs, legal defense expenses, transportation pollution liability, offsite disposal coverage….  Multi year term policies can be negotiated. 

    Transportation Pollution Liability 

    Generally, Business Auto or Truckers policies will exclude pollution losses arising from spills or other releases of transported cargo. Transportation pollution liability affords coverage during the loading, unloading and transportation, for a spill, release or sudden upset and over turn of transported cargo.  

    Incidental Professional Liability 

    Professional exposures are generally excluded from General Liability and monoline Contractors Pollution Liability policies. In the course of their normal operations, contractors face all types of professional exposures. They may make slight adjustments on the provided plans to get the job done properly, they may supervise subcontractors, or provide other recommendations which could potentially be questioned in the event of a claim. In the event of a professional claim, will your insurance provide coverage? 

    Underground Storage Tanks

    Financial responsibility requirements ensure that owners and operators of underground storage tank systems have the ability to financially handle a release from an underground storage tank. The responsibility encompasses the ability to pay funds for corrective action and third party bodily injury and property damage from non-sudden and sudden and accidental releases from a regulated underground tank system.  

    Property Transfer Liability

    When buying or selling property there can be unknown preexisting environmental conditions. Since a Phase I or Phase II survey cannot guarantee uncovering all potential environmental liabilities, insurance companies have created property transfer insurance. This coverage protects the new owner or any party with an insurable interest, against unknown environmental conditions that may be discovered during the policy period, that were not caused by the new owner. Property transfer coverage assists to keep the property at its maximum value while allowing the insured to negotiate more favorable loan terms than property not supported by this coverage.      

  • Remediation Contractors

    What is a Pollutant? 

    Any material, substance, liquid, product, etc… which is introduced into an environment for other than its intended use / purpose. In other words, something that ends up where it doesn’t belong. Fresh water, cheese, and milk have all been classified as pollutants by Insurance Carriers under various circumstances. 

    Many insureds assume that claims arising from operations are covered by the general liability policy. However, claims resulting from a “pollution incident” are excluded from most general liability policies, which leaves many of these insureds exposed to potentially uncovered claims. What pollutants are impacting your business?

    Environmental Exposures Impacting Remediation Contractors

    May include, but are not limited to: failure to identify or mischaracterize contamination during surveys; faulty design of remedial action and management plans causing bodily injury; diagnostic laboratory errors; hazardous air emission from incomplete abatement; inaccurate post-abatement certification; impacting underground structures from subsurface investigation activities; cross contamination of aquifers due to improper design, selection of materials, equipment leading to remedial system failure; improper installation and permitting of remedial systems leading to hazardous waste releases; failure to notify public and/or EPA of contamination or releases; failure to effectively monitor and maintain safe working conditions; CERCLA liability due to O&M activities at Superfund sites and from waste disposal site selection; vicarious liability due to use of subcontractors and sub-consultants;   inadequate or improper storage of samples; performance of inappropriate/incorrect tests or analytical methods;  exacerbation of preexisting contamination during excavation and cleanup efforts; inadvertent mixing of incompatible wastes; release of oils/fuels from equipment leaks and vandalism; trench collapse due to improper shoring; completed operations exposures due to incomplete or improper line hookup and remedial system construction….

    Environmental Claim Scenarios

    1. A consultant hired a driller to perform sampling of subsurface soils. The consultant directed the driller to drill and draw a sample. The driller accidentally advanced through a UST. Both the consultant and driller were sued for $140,000 in damages, including UST repair and soil remediation. 
    2. A consultant provided plans and specification for the installation of monitoring wells at a contaminated facility. Contamination had seeped from the ground surface into a shallow aquifer. Following installation of monitoring wells, sampling showed evidence of contamination in both the shallow aquifer and in lower lying aquifer. The facility owner filed a claim against the consultant, alleging that well placement (location and depth) was responsible for the cross-contamination of the lower lying aquifer. The settlement amounted to $250,000. 
    3. During remedial activities at a Superfund Landfill site, a remedial action contractor (RAC) inadvertently crushed several drums that were improperly classified as empty. As a result, several gallons of hazardous contents were released, causing localized soil contamination. The RAC failed to notify the EPA of the release, which resulted in both criminal and civil actions against the contractor. The RAC was held liable under CERCLA and was required to pay penalties exceeding $6.1 million. 
    4. A remediation contractor excavated a small underground diesel tank near a distribution warehouse and noted that stained soil surrounded the tank. The project manager advised the firm to continue excavating around the tank, which pulled up contaminated soil. Because of the foundations proximity to the distribution center, the excavation of contaminated material without proper shoring equipment caused the building’s wall to collapse. The distribution center’s walls and roof also collapsed. Reconstruction costs, business interruption, lost profits and additional remediation expenses totaled $1.2 million. 
    5. A fire water restoration contractor was accused of not remediating mold at a home where he was contracted to do so. The homeowner had other work performed that caused the mold but brought all contractors and sub-contractors into a lawsuit. The insured incurred $30,000 in costs to defend themselves against the groundless claim.
    6. An environmental services contractor was hired to perform a tank cleaning by their client.  During the tank cleaning, a 4-inch hose connected to the contractor’s vacuum truck failed. 127 gallons of fuel oil was released onto the ground and flowed into an adjacent waterway. The contractor called the 24-hour/7-days a week emergency response hotline, listed in their Contractor’s Pollution Liability (CPL) policy, immediately after the spill.  The insurer coordinated with their local environmental technical consultant and the contractor to respond to the spill. An experienced environmental remediation firm was sent to the site of the release to start the remediation effort.  The local firm also interacted with the State environmental agency on the contractor’s behalf. The contractor’s CPL policy paid $209,000 for expenses associated with this release.
    7. An asbestos abatement contractor was hired along with an electrical contractor to remove asbestos insulation from ceiling mounted light fixtures in an attic.  The asbestos contractor removed the insulation and the electrical contractor was to remove and replace the fixtures.  After hours, someone turned on the lights and the exposed bulb ignited the new insulation which started a fire. In trying to extinguish the fire, water was sprayed in the attic.  The result was fire and smoke damage as well as water damage to the structure and contents.
    8. A mold abatement firm was contracted to remediate mold from a residential condominium complex.  The scope of the contract was for mold remediation but only after the moisture intrusion problem had been repaired by the claimant. Under the direction of the construction manager and environmental consultant on the project, the Insured completed the mold abatement of the buildings. Plaintiff sued for Bodily Injury and Property Damage for mold recurrence.  Insured alleges the repairs to the roof and chimney failed to correct the moisture problems. Carrier is incurring costs associated with the defense coverage.
    9. A remediation firm was hired for an abatement project in an old warehouse. During the selective demolition process, the contractor damaged a hidden water pipe behind the wall.  They immediately shut off the water but contents stored in that area were damaged. Carrier is paying property damage for the structure and the warehouse contents.
    10. A fire and water damage restoration contractor was hired to do the emergency water extraction of a residence.  The homeowner later found dust, had it tested and found that it contained lead.  The homeowner’s personal insurance carrier is alleging the contractor was not properly qualified to do the emergency water extraction, thus causing lead contamination.  Carrier has set the reserve at $15,000 for damages and $5,000 for defense costs.
    11. A contractor was subject to cleanup costs after vandals opened an onsite mobile refueling tank causing diesel fuel to be released onto virgin soil.

    Benefits of Environmental Liability Insurance

    Because environmental losses are a severity risk, rather than a frequency risk, the majority of remediation contractors lack the financial strength to self-insure their potential environmental liabilities. Since every remediation contractor has notable environmental exposures, consideration to the economies of scale afforded with environmental liability insurance as part of your risk transfer strategy, versus self-insuring. 

    Three Overlooked benefits of environmental liability insurance:

    1. Defense Costs:  Environmental liabilities are relatively new and very litigious.  Even if you do nothing wrong you can still get named in a suit and have to expense defense costs i.e. legal fees, environmental investigations, etc.  
    2. Claim Management:  All policies come with specialists to assist you in handling a claim.  Who is in charge of communications, public relations, emergency response, government compliance, financial management, third party claims for bodily injury, property damage, natural resource damages….?
    3. Third Party Liability:  The majority of the time the cost to clean up the environmental problem/s is far less than the associated claims that come in from third parties for bodily injury, property damage and business interruption.  You need to look at your client’s and neighbors that can be impacted if you or a sub-contractor/vendor cause an environmental loss.        

    Environmental Liability Insurance Coverages for Remediation Contractors

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)

    Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) insurance protects the insured should they cause or exacerbate an environmental condition while performing their contractor services.  CPL protects the insured for covered operations performed by or on behalf of the insured, while operating away from any premises they own, rent, lease or occupy. Coverage can be written on a job specific basis, or on a blanket basis to cover all the work performed by the insured.  Most policies can be endorsed to cover transportation pollution liability, mold, lead, asbestos, defense outside the limits, off-site disposal coverage.   

    Environmental service providers incorporating CPL coverage as part of their risk transfer strategy, drive their growth and profits by marketing the benefits CPL coverage affords in reducing job interruption due to environmental issues.     

    A major environmental liability exposure faced by all contractors lies in who they are doing business with.  If there is an environmental loss at a job site, innocent contractors can and do get named in lawsuits.  Do your subs/vendors have CPL insurance if they cause an environmental loss?

    Professional Liability 

    The absolute pollution exclusion in a standard commercial general liability policy excludes sudden and accidental, and gradual pollution losses due to the release of “solid, liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritants or contaminants, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acid, alkalis, chemicals and waste”….  Engineering firms who work in solving environmental exposures faced by their clients need to have coverage for negligent acts, errors or omissions that may result in damages caused by pollution conditions. 

    There are various ways coverage can be written to protect the engineering firm and their clients. Professional liability on a standalone basis or professional liability including general liability (GL) is available. For engineering firms that may also get involved in doing hands on work at the job site, they can add to the coverage contractors pollution liability (CPL) insurance, (refer to contractors pollution liability insurance for more details). Coverage for the professional liability is done on a claims made basis. For the GL and CPL, coverage can be on a claims made or occurrence form basis. 

    You have to also keep in mind there are contractors that in the performance of their work may act in a consultants or engineers capacity. You need to make sure you offer your client the broadest program available to meet their needs. By combining the coverage’s under one contract you are eliminating potential gaps in coverage.  Coverage can be purchased on a job specific basis or to cover all the work performed by your client on an annual basis. 

    Coverage applies specifically to services / operations identified under the policies declaration page.   

    Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL) 

    EIL is for environmental service providers that own, rent, lease, operate or have any other insurable interest in real property (a fixed site facility such as a service garage and shop, transfer/recycling facility, landfill….) that can be susceptible to pollution liabilities that actually or allegedly originated from the insured property. 

    Coverage can include: Pre-existing unknown pollution, new pollution conditions, first party on-site clean up, third party bodily injury, property damage, business interruption and extra expense, off site cleanup costs, legal defense expenses, transportation pollution liability, offsite disposal coverage….  Multi year term policies can be negotiated. 

    Transportation Pollution Liability 

    Generally, Business Auto or Truckers policies will exclude pollution losses arising from spills or other releases of transported cargo. Transportation pollution liability affords coverage during the loading, unloading and transportation, for a spill, release or sudden upset and overturn of transported cargo.      

    Underground Storage Tanks

    Financial responsibility requirements ensure that owners and operators of underground storage tank systems have the ability to financially handle a release from an underground storage tank. The responsibility encompasses the ability to pay funds for corrective action and third party bodily injury and property damage from non-sudden and sudden and accidental releases from a regulated underground tank system.  

    Property Transfer Liability

    When buying or selling property there can be unknown preexisting environmental conditions. Since a Phase I or Phase II survey cannot guarantee uncovering all potential environmental liabilities, insurance companies have created property transfer insurance. This coverage protects the new owner or any party with an insurable interest, against unknown environmental conditions that may be discovered during the policy period, that were not caused by the new owner. Property transfer coverage assists to keep the property at its maximum value while allowing the insured to negotiate more favorable loan terms than property not supported by this coverage.      

  • There Are 532 Superfund Sites in Indian Country! How many contaminated sites don’t we know about?

     environmental Strategist™, between the lines:  My question after you read the article below is how many contaminated sites don’t we know about?

    Under CERCLA you are responsible for the environmental condition of your property.  What if a third party contaminates your property and they do not have the financial ability to correct the problem?  Your asset has just become a liability.

    Contamination from third parties can come from air, water, soil, ground water or just over the surface of the land and below are real life examples.

    While this article points out that 25% of Superfund sites are on Tribal land, the other 75% represent and even greater impact on human health and the environment.

    Environmental Strategist™ Risk Management Tip:  Environmental insurance can protect real estate owners if third parties contaminate their property.

    Environmental Trivia Question:  Where are the highest concentration of Superfund Sites in the United States?  Answer below article.

    Kill the Land, Kill the People: There Are 532 Superfund Sites in Indian Country!

    Terri Hansen:  Indian Country Today – 6/17/14

    Of a total of 1,322 Superfund sites as of June 5, 2014, nearly 25 percent of them are in Indian country. Manufacturing, mining and extractive industries are responsible for our list of some of the most environmentally devastated places in Indian country, as specified under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the official name of the Superfund law enacted by Congress on December 11, 1980. 

    Most of these sites are not cleaned up, though not all of the ones listed below are still active. Some sites are capped, sealing up toxics that persist in the environment. In cases like the Navajo, the Akwesasne Mohawk and the Quapaw Tribe, the human health impacts are known because some doctors and scientists took enough interest to do studies in their regions. Some of those impacts may persist through generations given the involvement, as in the case of the Mohawk, of endocrine disrupters. 

    TheSalt Chuck Mine Superfund site in southeast Alaska operated as a copper-palladium-gold-silver mine from 1916 to 1941. Members of the Organized Village of Kasaan, a federally recognized tribe, traditionally harvested fish, clams, cockles, crab and shrimp from the waters in and around Salt Chuck, unaware for decades that areas of impact were saturated with tailings from the former mine. As if that weren’t enough, Pure Nickel Inc. holds rights to mining leases in the area and began active exploration to do even more mining in summer 2012, according to Ground Truth Trekking.

    The Elem Band of Pomo Indians, whose colony was built on top of the waste of what would become California’s Sulfur Bank Mine Superfund site in 1970, have elevated levels of mercury in their bodies, and now fear for their health. According to an NBC News investigation, nearby Clear Lake is the most mercury-polluted lake in the world, despite the EPA’s spending about $40 million over two decades trying to keep mercury contamination out of the water. Although the EPA cleaned soil from beneath Pomo homes and roads, pollution still seeps beneath the earthen dam built by the former mine operator, Bradley Mining Co. For years, Bradley Mining has fought the government’s efforts to recoup cleanup costs.

    The Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California requested EPA involvement in the cleanup of an abandoned open pit sulfur mine on the eastern slope of California’s Sierra Nevada that became the Leviathan Mine Superfund site. The Washoe Tribe had become concerned that contaminated waters were affecting their lands downstream, causing impacts to culture and health, environmental damage, remediation, monitoring and testing, posting of health advisories, drinking water, effects on pregnancy, and cancer. Aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, manganese, nickel and thallium have beendetectedin surface water and sediment downstream from the mine. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concluded that exposures could result in cancerous and non-cancerous health effects.

    The abandoned FMC phosphorus facility occupies more than 1,000 acres of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho, and lies within Eastern Michaud Flats Superfund site. The primary contaminants of concern at the site are arsenic, elemental phosphorous and gamma radiation. FMC left a legacy of contamination in the air, groundwater, soil and the nearby Portneuf River, which threatened plants, wildlife and human health on the reservation and in surrounding communities. The Shoshone-Bannock have long asked for a cleanup of contaminated soils, but instead the EPA’s 2012 interimremedyis to cap and fill, including areas containing gamma radiation and radionuclides.

    Answer to trivia question:  Silicon Valley

  • Marinas, Yacht Clubs, and Shipyards…What is your strategy?

    Environmental Strategist, between the lines: 

    I often talk on the three benefits environmental insurance offers insureds besides what most people think of, first party cleanup.

    3 benefits of environmental insurance: 

    1.  Defense Coverage
    2. Specialists to assist you in handling a claim
    3. Coverage for third party Bodily injury, third party property damage, Third party business interruption.

    You can read the story below and view videos on how a simple boat fire impacts all three of the benefits offered by environmental insurance.  I would also like to point out that over the years when I have strategized on marine fires the quick response back I most often hear from the environmentally uninformed is a boat will burn and sink, besides fuel you won’t have any other liabilities.  Read On!

    La Conner boat fire. Photo courtesy of the Seattle Times
    La Conner boat fire 2/21/14. Photo courtesy of the Seattle Times

    La Conner marina fire: sunken boats and ‘broken hearts’

    A fire destroyed seven boats and damaged at least eight more, totaling an estimated $1 million in damage at Shelter Bay Marina near La Conner in Skagit County on Friday afternoon.

    The fire started at about 4 p.m. on one boat at the residential marina and quickly spread to adjacent boats, according to Shelter Bay community manager David Franklin.

    One dock was engulfed in flames, which allowed one burning boat to float to another dock and further spread the fire, he said.

    Firefighters were able to contain the damage on the adjacent dock, but they weren’t able to fully knock down the fire until shortly after 6 p.m., Franklin said.

    “There were no injuries,” he said, “just a lot of broken hearts for those boats that were lost.”

    Dylan Furst, of Bellingham, said he saw the cloud of black smoke from about two miles away while he was driving to Bellingham from Deception Pass. He could smell the smoke from more than 400 yards away, he said.

    Furst said firefighters had trouble aiming directly at the flames because the boats kept drifting.

    “It was just one big fire of boats,” Furst said. “They weren’t separated at all.”

    Firefighters from multiple agencies responded, including the Swinomish Reservation, Skagit County, La Conner and the U.S. Coast Guard.

    Some residents tried to move unaffected boats away from the flames as firefighters battled the blaze with water and foam, the Swinomish Yacht Club reported via Twitter.

    “With boat fires, with the water, fiberglass, fuel and the intensity of the flame, it’s very difficult to put out,” La Conner Fire Chief Dan Taylor said.

    The 15 boats that burned are 40- to 50-foot pleasure craft kept at the 325-slip marina in the private, gated community of Shelter Bay on the Swinomish Channel. Six of the seven boats that were destroyed sank, and the seventh was severely burned, Skagit County Fire District 13 Chief Roy Horn told the Skagit Valley Herald.

    One resident told the newspaper that his $300,000 yacht, with 400 gallons of diesel fuel, burned and then sank.

    “They were nice boats,” Franklin said. “Very nice boats.”

    Franklin said officials will work to determine the cause and the full extent of the damage Saturday, as well as the possible environmental impacts, including the diesel fuel that leaked into the channel.

    “We’ll see what the morning light brings,” Franklin said. “Hopefully, tomorrow, it won’t be as bad as we think.”

    Material from The Associated Press was used in this report.

    Paige Cornwell: 206-464-2530 or pcornwell@seattletimes.com

    Update 2-26-14:  LA CONNER —

    Recovery operations of several sunken ships continue this week in Shelter Bay.  Crews were able to remove two damaged vessels this weekend but have run into problems recovering the remaining five ships. Fire damage to the ships has complicated the salvage efforts.

    Crews are also using placing booms and absorbent pads on the water to recover fuel after discovering skimmers to be ineffective. Damage is estimated at more than $1 million. The cause is still under investigation.

    Update:  All burned boats removed from La Conner marina

    The Associated Press LA CONNER, Wash. — 

    All six boats that sank during the fire at the Shelter Bay Marina in La Conner have been pulled from the water.

    Ecology Department spokeswoman Lisa Copeland also says 600 gallons of diesel were removed from a seventh vessel that was destroyed in Friday’s fire but did not sink.

    The Skagit Valley Herald reports (http://bit.ly/1k9f0HC ) cleanup of an estimated 2,400 gallons of spilled oil and fuel may continue through Friday.

    Copeland says there have been no reports of oiled birds or other impact to wildlife.

    The property loss from the fire is estimated at more than $1 million.

    These videos give a prime example of the public outcry that results when pollution incidents occur, and show another major reason why environmental liability coverage is such a valuable asset for businesses. Especially when local residents are potentially impacted and government regulators get involved –

    Video of the fire scene and local residents reactions  

    Video of the aftermath

    Video of Salvage operations 

    Video of the fire from third party spectators