Blog

  • environmental Strategist™ QR Codes User Guide

    environmental Strategist™ (eS) assists businesses to manage and transfer their environmental exposures.  The first step on every eS path begins at www.estrategist.com.  Our latest eS educational resource is the eS QR Codes, designed to leverage the user’s business model.

    QR codes (abbreviated from Quick Response Code) can be used with Smartphone’s (IPhone, Android…)  or Tablets (IPad, Surface…).  QR Codes were originally designed for industrial uses but now Smartphone / Tablet users can install a free app with a QR-code scanner that can read a displayed code directing the Smartphone / Tablet browser to a website providing specific information.  In this case eS brand resources.

    The strategy behind the eS QR Codes, is taking advantage of the latest technology to equip business professionals with eS brand resources they can utilize in field and share with clients, prospects, support staff and other team members.  [update]

    The initial set of eS QR codes offer:

    1.   eS environmental Risk Assessments (eRA).  An eRA is used to get the eS and their client / prospect on the same page about the environmental exposures impacting their operations.  The eRA is broken down into three sections.  Section #1 reviews potential environmental exposures impacting a specific class of business (Agriculture, Manufacturers, Commercial Contractors, Real Estate Owners / Developers).  Section #2 goes over environmental loss examples and Section #3 describes environmental insurance coverage appropriate for a class of business to consider in adding value to their business model.
    2. QR Codes describing why businesses should consider adding environmental insurance to their business model, along with an overview on an assortment of environmental insurance coverage’s, i.e. Environmental Impairment Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability, Storage Tank Liability, Transportation Pollution Liability and more.
    3. eS marketing strategies that revolutionize the way insurance products are delivered to insured’s.

    Armed with the eS QR Codes, you now have another arrow in your quiver to distinguish and separate yourself from the competition while adding value to your clients.

    Contact us today for your set of QR Codes, or to become a certified eS go to www.estrategist.com.  Questions?  Email Chris Bunbury @ jcbunbury@aol.com or Parker Bunbury @ parkerbunbury@gmail.com.

     

  • San Mateo Creek: Water leak kills fish

    environmental Strategist™, between the lines:  What is a pollutant?  In this case fresh drinking water. environmental Strategist (eS) define a “Pollutant” as a material, substance or product that gets introduced to an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.  In other words, something that ends up where it does not belong, like fresh drinking water.

    Water leak kills fish –  Tuesday, February 12, 2013

    A broken pipe sent thousands of gallons of drinking water cascading into San Mateo Creek over the weekend, killing scores, possibly thousands, of fish from chlorine poisoning.

    The dead fish began floating to the surface Saturday when a thousand gallons a minute of chlorinated water flowed down a forested hillside into the creek about a half-mile below Crystal Springs Reservoir, according to utility officials and residents.  Utility officials located the break in a 60-inch-diameter pipe next to a concrete bridge.  It took them eight hours to cut off the flow along a 4-mile section of pipeline, but water was still leaking out Monday at a rate of 200 gallons a minute, officials said.

    The exact death toll has not yet been determined.  Rare steelhead trout, which have been listed as threatened along the Central Coast under the Endangered Species Act since 1997, were believed to have been killed.

    The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission oversees the sprawling network that supplies drinking water to 2.5 million people in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Alameda counties.

    Aging pipes, “We don’t know if it was corrosion or a seal or what,” said Steven Ritchie, the assistant general manager for water at the utilities commission. “There are joints in pipes. Sometimes they shift. We don’t know exactly why it broke, but it was undoubtedly related to its old age.”

    “One of the challenges with drinking water is that the things we need to add to it to make it safe can be toxic out in the environment,” Ritchie said. “The chlorine is what makes it safe for us to drink, but it doesn’t do very well in a stream. It’s basically bleach and it kills fish.

    Besides trout, sculpin, stickleback and suckerfish were killed. Ducks, great blue herons and other wildlife were feeding on the dead fish, which range in size from 6 inches to a foot. “I don’t know if it killed all the species,” Rogers said, “but the creek looks sterile. It could take years for it to recover.”

    “As far as I’m concerned, any fish that we kill is a problem,” Ritchie said. “We pride ourselves on taking care of the environment, so this is

    really of great concern to us. Our job now is to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

    Peter Fimrite and Kevin Fagan are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers.

  • To Leverage Insurance Sales, environmental Strategist™ Is The Game Changer

    This competitive environmental intelligence will give you the best way to improve your insurance sales in today’s business environment.

    Before delving into why environmental Strategist™ (eS) is the game changer for insurance professionals I think it’s important that we all understand what a pollutant is.

    If you look at a standard property and casualty insurance policy, pollutants are described smoke, soot, vapors, fumes, acids, alkalis, etc., etc.

    However, due to the way the insurance industry has responded to past insurance claims, environmental strategist™ (eS) has fashioned a definition of a pollutant that is more palatable for your insureds.

    A Pollutant is, “a material, substance, or product, introduced to an environment for other than it’s intended use or purpose.”  In other words, something ends up where it does not belong.

    Let me offer you several examples.

    In one instance, fresh water was accidentally introduced into a salt water aquarium. This resulted in a die off of aquatic life.  When a claim was filed with the GL carrier, they denied coverage stating the fresh water was a pollutant.

    In another situation, cheese!  A cheese delivery truck was in an accident and caught on fire. The cheese melted and went down into the sewer system.  Once in the sewer system the cheese hardened, creating sewer backups.  When the insured filed  a claim with their insurance carrier, the carrier denied coverage saying the cheese was a pollutant.

    I could also share examples of milk, beer and even cooking oil being classified as pollutants.  Bottom line, something that ends up where it is not intended can be a pollutant.

    Now that we are all on the same page about what a pollutant is, you have a better understanding why eS points out that every business can be impacted by environmental exposures.  You can’t operate a business without being impacted by environmental exposures which means every business has a need for eS services.

    Understanding the demand for eS services is quite simple.  The analogy I use is how the computer industry created demand for IT professionals and today’s environmental industry has created the demand for eS professionals.

    eS research shows that fewer than 5% of licensed property and casualty insurance professionals are actively working with environmental insurance products and less than 10% of potential insureds currently purchase environmental insurance.  This all adds up to huge opportunities and the question is how can an insurance professional take advantage?

    Enter, www.estrategist.com.  After more than two decades of development and field testing, www.estrategist.com  offers insurance professionals the opportunity to earn their eS designation.  The mission of a certified eS is to assist businesses with managing and transferring environmental risk.  The eStrategist (www.estrategist.com) gives an insurance professional everything they need to go from novice to environmental specialist.

    eS brings a revitalizing strategy to insurance professionals.  Why?  Because certified eS do not sell anything, we educate.  eS deliver resources insurance professionals can share with commercial businesses so the first thing a commercial business can determine is whether eS can add value to their business model.  And why is this so critical?  Because people are tired of being sold and when you sell, the majority of the time it becomes a commodity based transaction.

    Let me give you a simple example.  It’s common knowledge in the property and casualty insurance industry the majority of insurance agents collect expiration dates, so 90 days before the renewal of an insurance policy the agent can try to make an appointment to work on an insured’s renewal.

    At eS we call this the “90 days and pray” insurance sales which creates lower success rates and encourages commodity based selling with reduced profit margins.  Why?  because you are competing against several agents all essentially trying to sell the same product.

    The eS educational business strategy for insurance professionals reverses this sales strategy by contacting a prospect 90 days after renewal of their commercial P&C insurance.  Why 90 days after renewal?  Because the smoke has cleared and the commodity based insurance agent are gone chasing expiration dates with low success rates.

    When the certified eS insurance professional calls and shares with a business how they would like to meet and strategize on managing and transferring their environmental exposures to better compete in today’s’ business environment, they have a better chance of getting the business’s attention.

    The first response back from a business likely is, “what type of environmental exposures”?  This is when eS utilize the environmental Risk Assessments (eRA) resource at www.estrategist.com.

    The eRA can be hand delivered or emailed and allows the eS and their prospect to get on the same page about the environmental exposures impacting their operations.  eRA’s are accessible to eS in a cut and paste format so eS can customize the eRA to compliment their agencies marketing presentations.

    The eRA comes in three parts:

    1.  Review of specific environmental exposure impacting a particular class of business.

    2.  Environmental loss examples

    3.  Environmental insurance coverage’s that are appropriate for that class of business to consider.

    Once the eRA has been delivered to their prospect, the eS follows up to strategize in more detail about the educational information offered in the eRA.  The vast majority of the time, the eRA educated prospect is open to meet and strategize on managing and transferring their environmental exposures.

    After the initial meeting a business generally wants to meet internally to discuss the eS strategies offered to improve their operations.  When they call back the eS to move forward with assisting in the managing and transferring their environmental exposures the eS has now been elevated to a trusted advisor and team member.

    Another benefit for the eS is 90 days before the renewal of their new client’s insurance, when all of the commodity based “90 days and pray” insurance agents start calling, the business naturally reaches out to their eS insurance professional team member for assistance with their P&C renewal.  Why, because the eS is a trusted advisor and all of the “90 days and pray” insurance agents did not demonstrate any value in assisting the business to succeed.

    The eS educational business strategy allows business transactions to naturally move forward while solving problems, growing profits, improving product quality, services….  With more than two decades of development and field testing www.estrategist.com is the game changer for insurance professionals looking to gain a competitive edge.

    Chris Bunbury, President of environmental Strategist points out, “insurance agents not discussing environmental exposures with client’s, may find the only coverage their client has when they experience an environmental loss is the insurance agents E&O policy.

    Certified eS are able to use the environmental Strategist™ name and logo on business cards, letter head and advertisements identifying them as an environmental specialist and industry leader.

    A certified eS not only distinguishes themselves as an industry leader but they can better contribute in pro-actively addressing the most critical issue impacting the planet earth, human beings and the global economy, our environment.”

    In conclusion, utilizing the eS educational business model the bar is raised on the level of the business transaction and eS position themselves as a trusted advisor, strategic partner and team member.  eS insurance professionals utilizing the eRA find it an excellent way to leverage their insurance sales.

    eS business lead strategy to leverage your insurance sales:  The term “Brownfield site” means real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.  There are millions of Brownfield sites in the United States.  Most municipalities (counties, parishes, cities…) have Brownfield redevelopment boards and their meetings / minutes / website is public information.  From the public Brownfield information you can find out who is involved in a Brownfield, what the development plan is, how much it will cost to clean up, what the end use will be and so much more.  eS understand that Brownfields are like an annuity for eS insurance professionals because you assist to manage and transfer the environmental exposures for the Brownfields developer and once the cleanup and build out are completed, the end use industrial, retail, office, residential…, occupants will also have a need for your insurance products.  eS understand that the best way to sell standard property and casualty insurance products is to develop the relationship by delivering value.  For business operating in today’s business environment, managing and transferring environmental exposures is part of “Best Practices” and insurance professionals that can assist will be strategic partners and trusted advisors.

    Contact: environmentalstrategist@gmail.com or call 231-218-1041 for questions or more information.

     

    ERMI utilizes environmental Strategist brand resources because they have proven they will increase insurance sales for our retail insurance agents.

  • Is Mickey Mouse a Polluter?

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  If you have ever been to one of the Disney parks you have seen and experienced firsthand what meticulous detail is given to every aspect of their business model including risk management.  If something as obvious as an aging air conditioning system can slip past Disney’s meticulous attention to detail, what chance do your typical American businesses stand in addressing their environmental expousres?

    Whether Disney is at fault or not they are still going to have expenses for legal fees, hiring environmental engineers, drillers, laboratory analysis, claims management, public relations.  Don’t forget the reputational risk factor.  My observation is that reputational risk is very critical in the Disney business model and Mickey or Donald or Goofy or Bambi or Dumbo or Snow White…. being polluters is not good PR.

    Since every business is impacted by environmental exposures, today’s Best Practices means businesses must have an environmental Management Strategy (eMS) in order to eliminate or reduce their exposure to the Disney syndrome.  I call it the Disney syndrome because the majority of businesses believe environmental liabilities only happen in fairy tales.  To learn how to deliver Best Practices environmental risk management while becoming a certified environmental Strategist™ go to www.estrategist.com.

    Disney May be A Source of Groundwater Pollution

    Source: AP

    24 Aug 2012

    A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency consultant says a vintage air conditioning system at the Walt Disney Studios may be a source of Burbank groundwater contamination.

    The Los Angeles Times says the studio is among a list of facilities being investigated as possible sources of chromium 6 contamination. The cancer-causing heavy metal is widely used in aerospace manufacturing and other industries.

    California health officials tested soil two years ago in a nearby park that had received discharges from Disney’s cooling system. It was reported that chromium 6 levels were not a public health threat.

    Lockheed Martin Corp. paid $60 million in 1996 to settle claims by residents who said exposure to chromium 6 and other toxins at its former Burbank aircraft plant left them with cancer and other maladies.

  • Lawsuit seeks cleanup of creek by Gig Harbor Sportsman’s Club

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  Heavy metal contamination like the example in the article below is an obvious environmental exposure for a sporting club.  Some of the not so obvious environmental exposures for sporting clubs identified by environmental Strategist™ at www.estrategist.com are:  Vapor intrusion;  Storm water runoff;  Illegal disposal of waste;  Improper treatment and/or disposal and/or operation of sanitary wastewater facilities; Fuel spills from recreational equipment; Unknown abandoned underground storage tanks;  Siltation of nearby streams, rivers, or lakes;  Improper erosion control management; Electrical equipment containing toxic PCBS;  Old, abandoned wells which are not properly closed and serve as an open conduit for groundwater contamination;  Old septic systems; Pressurized gas cylinders;  Loading and unloading products from tucks / planes / trains / boats;  Pollution from neighboring properties which causes soil, surface water or ground-water contamination; Easements that cross the property which may leak or spill hazardous materials;  Residual contamination such as fertilizers or pesticides from past farming or similar uses;  Spills and air emission from power generators….

    Lawsuit seeks cleanup of creek by Gig Harbor Sportsman’s Club 

    Date 08/22/2012
    Source: Peninsula Gateway (Gig Harbor, WA)
    Aug. 22–A lawsuit filed Friday in Pierce County Superior Court by Burnham Construction seeks to require the Gig Harbor Sportsman’s Club to clean up decades of contamination in a nearby local stream.

    North Creek, a small stream that feeds into Donkey Creek and eventually to Gig Harbor Bay and Puget Sound, has seen an accumulation of heavy metals from spent shots fired from the Sportsman’s Club, the lawsuit claims.

    Investigations by the state Department of Ecology and the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department found that samples immediately downstream of the Sportsman’s Club had lead concentrations 900 times higher than the state’s water quality criteria. Ecology concluded that North Creek had the highest levels of lead pollution of any water body in the state.

    Burnham Construction is a subsidiary of Donkey Creek Holdings and the owner of property immediately adjacent to and downstream of the Sportsman’s Club property.

    Representatives of Donkey Creek Holdings say they attempted to work with the club for more than a year, hoping the club would clean up and restore the creek.

    “We didn’t want bring this suit,” Wade Perrow, one of the owners of Donkey Creek Holdings, stated in a news release. “We appreciate the club’s rich history and the decades of service it has provided to the community.

    “We aren’t trying to force the club to close or move. We just want it to accept its legal responsibility to clean up the contamination its activities have caused and to stop polluting the creek.”

    Reporter Brett Davis can be reached at 253-853-9243 or by email at brett.davis@gateline.com. Follow him on Twitter @gateway_brett.

  • BRIEF: Judge rules insurance must pay for turnpike spill [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  How many times have you been driving your car and had something spray onto your vehicle by a commercial truck?  That type of loss scenario takes place every day, thousands of times, all across the country.  Do you have any transportation client’s that haul material that could be released to the environment and cause an environmental loss?

    Do you have clients using third party transporters to transport their goods?  If a third party transporter causes an environmental loss with your client’s goods, ultimately the owner of the goods, your client, will be held accountable for any resulting environmental damage including but not limited to cleanup, defense costs, third party bodily injury, third party property damage, third party business income, claims management….

    The environmental Strategist™ definition of a pollutant is a material, substance or product that gets introduced into an environment for other than its intended use or purpose.  environmental Strategist has claims examples where fresh water, cheese and milk have been classified as pollutants.  Can your clients afford to self insure their transportation exposure or should they transfer their exposure via a contract or insurance policy?

    How do your client’s receive their raw materials, FOB point of Shipment or FOB point of delivery?

    BRIEF: Judge rules insurance must pay for turnpike spill [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]
    Sept. 11–An insurance company providing coverage to the trucking company whose vehicle dropped a tar-like goo over the Pennsylvania Turnpike last fall must now cover some of the claims.U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti ruled on Friday that Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company of Texas must cover all claims against MTS Transport of Stevensville, Md., “except for claims of traditional environmental pollution.”

    A tanker truck owned by MTS Transport of Stevensville, Md., leaked asphalt flux, a substance often used in roofing, over a 40-mile stretch of the turnpike from New Castle and the Oakmont service plaza on Nov. 22, damaging an estimated 1,000 vehicles from 16 states. MTS Transport had $1 million in insurance coverage from the Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., but court filings indicated that was not enough money to cover all of the damage.

    MTS Transport wrote in documents filed in U.S. District Court that another company, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, provided it with an excess liability policy worth $4 million but that the company refused to pay.

    Liz Navratil: lnavratil@post-gazette.com, 412-263-1438 or on Twitter @LizNavratil.

     

  • New Hampshire Hospital Pays $200,000 Fine for Hazardous Waste Violations

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  Illegal disposal of waste in the United States is a tens of billions of dollars a year industry.  The medical industry generates huge amounts of regulated wastes.

    A favorite place to illegally dispose of waste is on vacant land.  Do you have any client’s that own vacant land?  Under Federal law, property owners are responsible for the environmental condition of their property.

    In some cases people / businesses are not aware they are illegally disposing of waste.  For example fluorescent light bulbs.  When fluorescent light bulbs burn out they are supposed to be disposed of as hazardous waste due to the mercury in the lights.  My experience is fluorescent lights are more often than not disposed of in the dumpster versus being properly disposed of as hazardous waste.

    New Hampshire Hospital Pays $200,000 Fine for Hazardous Waste Violations

    Thu, 2012-05-31 18:27

    Waste Age

    Allan Gerlat

    Concord (N.H.) Hospital Inc. has agreed to pay a fine of $205,000 for hazardous waste violations.

    The New Hampshire Department of Justice said in a news release that the Merrimack County Superior Court approved a settlement between the state and Capital Regional Health Care Corp. New Hampshire alleged that Concord Hospital failed to identify certain pharmaceutical wastes as hazardous wastes. Concord Hospital shipped the hazardous waste pharmaceuticals to facilities that were not authorized to accept the waste material.

    The state during an inspection discovered these violations, as well as the hospital’s failure to identify hazardous waste alcohols, solvents and used oil for recycling, and follow certain hazardous waste management requirements. The hospital quickly corrected the problems once they were identified by the state.

     

     

     

  • Businesses Say Sustainability is Vital to Long Term Growth, but Can Weaken Margins and Increase Short Term Costs, Accenture Study Finds

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  New Accenture (NYSE: ACN) research highlights the demand for certified environmental Strategist™ (eS) in today’s sustainable / transparent business environment.  The Accenture research points out “Companies are trying to meet consumer demand for sustainable products and services, but many cannot keep up.”   Certified eS assist business to manage and transfer their environmental exposures to minimize risk, maximize value and optimize resources.

    As the Accenture research highlights, “the vast majority (83 percent) of responding senior decision makers see spending on sustainability as an investment rather than a cost.  If you are looking to add value to your business model in today’s business environment, go to www.estrategist.com and invest in yourself.  In the process you will contribute to better protecting human health and the environment.

    Businesses Say Sustainability is Vital to Long Term Growth, but Can Weaken Margins and Increase Short Term Costs, Accenture Study Finds

    May 23, 2012

    LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)– The vast majority of businesses say that sustainability is vital to their future growth, but almost half say that margins are currently lower on sustainable products and services, according to new research by Accenture (NYSE: ACN).

    The survey of 250 senior executives in eight leading mature and emerging economies reveals that 44 percent think sustainability is critical to their business and 78 percent say it is vital to their future growth. Nearly two thirds (62 percent) of respondents claim their sustainable investments are motivated by customer expectations for sustainable products and services and 60 percent by the opportunity to drive growth. Only 41 percent of those surveyed are motivated by regulatory compliance and only 29 percent by the need to reduce energy and material costs.

    When respondents were asked if their sustainable investments are primarily aimed at aiding growth or improving efficiencies and cost cutting, almost twice as many pointed to growth over efficiencies (41 percent to 22 percent). In emerging markets, the distinction was greater still, exactly half of surveyed executives opting for growth over cost savings (18 percent).

    While the vast majority (83 percent) of responding senior decision makers see spending on sustainability as an investment rather than a cost, a majority (56 percent) say it is currently more expensive to be a sustainable business. 49 percent say that margins are currently lower on sustainable products and services. The figure rises to 54 percent of surveyed businesses in the United States and 58 percent in emerging markets.

    “The good news is that companies now systematically see sustainability as being vital to their future growth and core to their business,” said Bruno Berthon, Managing Director, Sustainability Services at Accenture. “Sustainability has broken free from the realm of regulatory pressure and reputation management, and is now rising into a virtuous circle of commercial opportunity and investment growth. Businesses must now industrialize and scale production in order to drive higher levels of productivity, operational discipline and cost optimization into what can often be immature operating models in high growth sustainable markets.”

    Premium Prices

    The concern over lower margins may be explained by the survey’s finding that businesses think consumers are reluctant to pay more for sustainable products and services. Almost half (47 percent) of respondents say that consumers are not willing to pay a premium for them (exactly a quarter of respondents believe that they are willing to do so).

    Nevertheless, 60 percent admit to charging premiums for sustainable products and services and the largest proportion of those that do so (68 percent) claim they can charge between 5 and 20 percent premiums. 17 percent claim they can charge premiums of between twenty and fifty percent. Yet, despite charging higher prices, over one third (37 percent) of surveyed businesses say they cannot keep up with customer demand for sustainable products and services. This figure rises to 44 percent in emerging markets.

    When asked what actions they have taken to respond to rising customer demand, 44 percent of respondents claim to have promoted existing sustainability credentials. 43 percent have launched new products and services and 41 percent have checked their supply chain credentials.

    “Companies are trying to meet consumer demand for sustainable products and services, but many cannot keep up,” said Berthon. “Businesses will have to look beyond adapted or customized products, short runs and premium pricing. Now is the time to get closer to consumers, embed sustainability early in the innovation and design process and put in place the operational capabilities to meet market demand at scale and profitably.”

    Actions for successful sustainable growth strategies

    Accenture Sustainability Services makes the following recommendations to ensure that companies are better able to keep up with market demand for sustainable products and services:

    1. Remodel innovation and design processes by embedding sustainability early, helping to drive greater resource efficiency in existing operations and create new sustainable products and services. Integrate consumers and other stakeholders throughout the innovation process, using enhanced social media capabilities.
    2. Invest in capabilities, including analytics, to improve understanding of fast changing consumer expectations for sustainable products and services, and to identify new business models and profitable market opportunities with innovative demand-side partners.
    3. Review operations and supply chain capabilities through sector- wide value chain collaborations that deliver adapted operating models, economies of scale and more responsive production and servicing.

    The survey was undertaken as part of Sustainability 24, an online global broadcast of live debates on sustainability issues, bringing together business and policy leaders from around the world. The event takes place on 23rd May 2012.

    A note on Japanese survey results

    The survey included 40 respondents from Japan. The data suggests that Japanese executives are less committed to sustainability as a source of growth. Less than one third (32 percent) said that sustainability is critical to their business versus 44 percent globally, and only 60 percent say is central to how they run their business, against the global average of 73 percent. The proportion seeing sustainability as an investment is approximately half in Japan compared to global figure (42 percent to 82 percent) and over half see it as a cost (58 percent) versus the 17 percent of all respondents. These figures may explain why only 36 percent of Japanese respondents say they are able to charge a premium, compared to the global average of 60 percent.

    Learn more at www.accenture.com/sustainabilitygrowth.

  • EPA Announces $69.3 Million to Clean Up Contaminated Sites and Revitalize Communities

    environmental Strategist, between the lines:  There are a few critical points I want to make on the EPA release below.

     

    1. 1.       Who are your neighbors and what if they have contamination coming onto your property but they do not have the financial where with all to pay for the environmental damages, you are now the owner of a piece of contaminated land.  Environmental insurance can protect an insured if third parties contaminate their property.  The EPA information below points out “there are an estimated 450,000 abandoned and contaminated waste sites in America.  Environmental Strategist research estimates the number of Brownfield sites in the United States to be in the multi millions.
    2. 2.      The web sites listed at the bottom of the EPA release in conjunction with your local Brownfield Redevelopment Authority websites can deliver enough information and generate enough leads to make any insurance professionals career very, very successful.  With Brownfields there are four stages where insurance professionals can make money.  The four stages are Acquisition, Cleanup, Redevelopment and End use (ACRE).  They are not making any more land, we have obviously done a great job of contaminating what we have so now in order to better protect human health and the environment we need to clean it up and you can profit on each and every ACRE.

     

    Why are there so many incentives for Brownfields?  They are economic multipliers that better protect human health and the environment while creating more jobs and increasing tax revenue.  As the article points out, “Since its inception EPA’s brownfields investments have leveraged more than $18.3 billion in cleanup and redevelopment funding from a variety of public and private sources and have resulted in approximately 75,500 jobs. More than 18,000 properties have been assessed, and over 700 properties have been cleaned up.”

     

    From: U.S. EPA

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    May 24, 2012

    EPA Announces $69.3 Million to Clean Up Contaminated Sites and Revitalize Communities

    Investment will protect people’s health and the environment, create jobs and promote economic redevelopment nationwide

    WASHINGTON – Today the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced $69.3 million in grants for new investments to provide communities with funding necessary to clean and redevelop contaminated properties, boost local economies and create jobs while protecting public health.

    “Restored Brownfield properties can serve as cornerstones for rebuilding struggling communities. These grants will be the first step in getting pollution out and putting jobs back into neighborhoods across the country,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Clean, healthy communities are places where people want to live, work and start businesses. We’re providing targeted resources to help local partners transform blighted, contaminated areas into centers of economic growth.”

    Highlights of the projects planned by grant recipients:

    • DeKalb County, Ga. plans to clean up and redevelop major industrial areas served by transit and infrastructure in community areas, in addition to expanding greenspace and community-based development. One important revitalization effort is targeted for the General Motors Assembly Plant (closed in 2008), which sits at the convergence of two major corridors and the Doraville MARTA Station. Upon redevelopment, the project will reduce blight and increase the local tax base.
     

    • Toledo, Ohio (Coalition) will use the awarded assessment grant funding to revitalize under-served neighborhoods and create local jobs at two proposed projects. The Coalition will investigate properties in the Cherry Street Corridor/Summit Street Redevelopment area to allow for the expansion of St. Vincent’s Hospital and Central Catholic High School. Secondly, the Fernwood Growing Center Area, located in an underserved, low income neighborhood, will be expanded by at least two additional sites for the use of urban agriculture.
    • Paul Cuffee School, a maritime charter school for Providence public school children in Rhode Island, is receiving two EPA cleanup grants to clean and redevelop adjacent properties for a new parking lot and athletic field for students.
    • Land-of-Sky, a local government planning and development organization located in N.C., will use grant funds awarded to rehabilitate the Chatham Site, a former manufacturing plant, a mill and a Western electric plant into approximately 150 multifamily rental units. The project may result in leveraging additional funding, including New Markets Tax Credits, construction permanent loans, Federal Historic Tax Credit equity, NC Mill Rehab Tax Credit equity and deferred development fees. Assessments have been completed and the project is ready to begin redevelopment.

    • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources will provide a loan from its Revolving Loan Fund to the city of Kenosha for the cleanup of the Kenosha Engine Plant Cleaning site, a former Chrysler/American Motors plant. The site, once the pride of southeastern Wisconsin, will provide the community the opportunity to market the site to private investors that could bring jobs and tax revenue to the community.

    There are an estimated 450,000 abandoned and contaminated waste sites in America. In 2011, EPA’s brownfields program leveraged 6,447 jobs and $2.14 billion in cleanup and redevelopment funds. Since its inception EPA’s brownfields investments have leveraged more than $18.3 billion in cleanup and redevelopment funding from a variety of public and private sources and have resulted in approximately 75,500 jobs. More than 18,000 properties have been assessed, and over 700 properties have been cleaned up. Brownfields grants also target under-served and low income neighborhoods – places where environmental cleanups and new jobs are most needed.

    See list of all awarded brownfields grants by state: http://cfpub.epa.gov/bf_factsheets/

    More information on EPA’s brownfields program: http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/

    More information on brownfields success stories: http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/success/index.htm

  • Jury Awards $14.6 Million For Factory Explosion

    Seven people were hurt in the 2009 explosion at a ConAgra Foods Inc., factory in Garner, N.C., and last month’s $14.6 million verdict in a 2009 Slim Jim factory explosion raises a host of issues for risk managers.

    By JONATHAN BERR,

    Investigation found that the explosion was due to the improper purging of air lines.

    Four people died in the 2009 incident, and the court in June will rule on punitive damages in connection with the Garner explosion. The Slim Jim accident highlights the poor job many food companies do in managing contractors.

    Jacobs Engineering, the company blamed for the blast at the now-shuttered plant, also may get hit with punitive damages, said David Stradley, the attorney representing the workers. ConAgra declined to comment on the case and Jacobs Engineering didn’t respond to inquiries.

    In a 2009 Associated Press dispatch, ConAgra was quoted as saying that since the accident it has “worked closely and fully cooperated” with authorities. ConAgra, however, declined to discuss the 26 citations and $134,773 in fines leveled by safety inspectors nearly three years ago.

    Investigators from the U.S. Chemical Safety Board determined that the accident occurred after contractors at the plant purged or removed air-in lines before gas flows through them without taking adequate safety precautions.

    Purging lines is supposed to prevent explosive mixtures of gas and air from forming, and safety advocates have argued for years that it was too dangerous to purge gas lines indoors after the practice was blamed for several prior explosions.

    Federal investigators were harsh in their criticism regarding what took place at the Slim Jim plant during the purging — which was occurring while a new water heater was being installed. Workers relied on their sense of smell instead of gas detection equipment to know when the piping had been purged.

    More than 200 people were in the building when the explosion occurred.

    Copyright 2012© LRP Publications